HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Intel Atom C5320
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 658 | Intel Atom C5320 | |
CPU comparisonHiSilicon Kirin 658 or Intel Atom C5320 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.35 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 658 was released in Q2/2016. The Intel Atom C5320 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz. The CPU supports up to 256 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Atom C5320 was released in Q2/2022. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Family | Intel Atom (108) |
| HiSilicon Kirin 650 (4) | CPU group | Intel Atom C5000 (5) |
| 4 | Generation | 6 |
| Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Parker Ridge |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe HiSilicon Kirin 658 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.35 GHz. The Intel Atom C5320 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.40 GHz. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 658 | Characteristic | Intel Atom C5320 |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.35 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
A-Core | 2.40 GHz |
| 1.70 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
B-Core | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| ARM Mali-T830 MP2 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.90 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Midgard 4 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 28nm | Technology | |
| 2 | Max. displays | |
| 2 | Compute units | -- |
| 32 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-T830 MP2 | GPU | no iGPU |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe HiSilicon Kirin 658 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Atom C5320 can connect up to 256 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 658 | Characteristic | Intel Atom C5320 |
| LPDDR3-933 | Memory | DDR4-2933 |
| Max. Memory | 256 GB | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 46.9 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | 9.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has a TDP of --, that of the Intel Atom C5320 is 41 W. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 658 | Characteristic | Intel Atom C5320 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 41 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe HiSilicon Kirin 658 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the Intel Atom C5320 cache has a total of 9.00 MB. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 658 | Characteristic | Intel Atom C5320 |
| 16 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, Intel QAT |
| -- | Socket | BGA 2106 |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2016 | Release date | Q2/2022 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz |
||
|
Intel Atom C5320
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom C5320
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 658
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 @ 0.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom C5320
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 658 | Intel Atom C5320 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
