HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs AMD FX-8140
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 620 | AMD FX-8140 | |
CPU comparisonHiSilicon Kirin 620 or AMD FX-8140 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The HiSilicon Kirin 620 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.20 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 620 was released in Q1/2015. The AMD FX-8140 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.10 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD FX-8140 was released in Q4/2012. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Family | AMD FX (30) |
| HiSilicon Kirin 620 (1) | CPU group | AMD FX-8000 (11) |
| 3 | Generation | 2 |
| Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Vishera (Bulldozer) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe HiSilicon Kirin 620 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 620 is 1.20 GHz while the AMD FX-8140 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD FX-8140 is at 3.20 GHz (4.10 GHz). |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 620 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8140 |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 1.20 GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 4.10 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 4.10 GHz |
Internal GraphicsThe HiSilicon Kirin 620 or AMD FX-8140 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.53 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 0.53 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Utgard | GPU Generation | -- |
| 28nm | Technology | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| 4 | Compute units | -- |
| 64 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 0 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe HiSilicon Kirin 620 can use up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The AMD FX-8140 supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 29.9 GB/s. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 620 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8140 |
| LPDDR3 | Memory | DDR3-1866 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 1 (Single Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 29.9 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the HiSilicon Kirin 620 is --, while the AMD FX-8140 has a TDP of 95 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 620 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8140 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 95 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe HiSilicon Kirin 620 is manufactured in 28 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The AMD FX-8140 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 8.00 MB cache. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 620 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8140 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 |
| -- | Socket | AM3+ |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q1/2015 | Release date | Q4/2012 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 4T @ 1.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 3.20 GHz (4.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
HiSilicon Kirin 620
4C 4T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
AMD FX-8140
8C 8T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 620
4C 4T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8140
8C 8T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 620
ARM Mali-450 MP4 @ 0.53 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8140
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 620
4C 4T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8140
8C 8T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 620 | AMD FX-8140 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
