Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 1330
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Google Tensor
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.80 GHz
Samsung Exynos 1330
54 %
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Google Tensor
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.80 GHz
Samsung Exynos 1330
58 %
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Google Tensor
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.80 GHz
Samsung Exynos 1330
74 %
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Google Tensor
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.80 GHz
Samsung Exynos 1330
74 %
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
90 entries
90 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Google Tensor (5) | Samsung Exynos (49) |
| CPU group | Google Tensor (1) | Samsung Exynos 1300 (2) |
| Architecture | G1 | Cortex-A78/-A55 |
| Technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor | Google Tensor G2 |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x Cortex-X1 2.80 GHz |
2x Cortex-A78 2.40 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 2x Cortex-A76 2.25 GHz |
6x Cortex-A55 2.00 GHz |
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A55 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | ||
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-G78 MP20 | ARM Mali-G68 MP2 |
| GPU frequency | 0.76 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 20 / 320 | 2 / 32 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2021 | Q2/2020 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Google Tensor AI | |
| AI specifications | Google Edge TPU @ 1.6 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5-5500 (53.0 GB/s) | LPDDR5 LPDDR4X |
| Max. Memory | 12 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 0 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Android | Android, Windows ARM |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q4/2021 | Q1/2023 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Google Tensor is 4.2 stars (78 ratings), while Samsung Exynos 1330 has received 3.8 stars (48 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
8
Google Tensor
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
Samsung Exynos 1330
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
