Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 880
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
Samsung Exynos 880
41 %
8C / 8T · 2.00 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
Samsung Exynos 880
43 %
8C / 8T · 2.00 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
Apple A14
Samsung Exynos 880
35 %
ARM Mali-G76 MP5
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
Samsung Exynos 880
46 %
8C / 8T · 2.00 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Apple A series (27) | Samsung Exynos (49) |
| CPU group | Apple A14 (1) | Samsung Exynos 800 (2) |
| Architecture | A14 (Firestorm/Icestorm) | Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 |
| Technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Apple A13 Bionic | |
| Successor | Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x Firestorm 3.00 GHz |
2x Cortex-A77 2.00 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Icestorm 1.82 GHz |
6x Cortex-A55 1.80 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 12.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 16.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Apple A14 | ARM Mali-G76 MP5 |
| GPU frequency | 1.46 GHz | 0.72 - 0.72 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 16 / 256 | 5 / 80 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 2 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2020 | Q3/2018 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine | |
| AI specifications | 16 Neural cores @ 11 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4X-4266 (34.1 GB/s) | LPDDR4X |
| Max. Memory | 6 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 0 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7.25 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | iOS | Android |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q3/2020 | Q2/2020 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Apple A14 Bionic is 3.9 stars (242 ratings), while Samsung Exynos 880 has received 5.0 stars (2 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Samsung Exynos 880
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
7
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
Apple A14 Bionic
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
