Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Apple A12Z Bionic vs AMD EPYC 7413
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Apple A12Z Bionic
79 %
8C / 8T · 2.49 GHz
AMD EPYC 7413
100 %
24C / 48T · 3.60 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Apple A12Z Bionic
32 %
8C / 8T · 2.49 GHz
AMD EPYC 7413
100 %
24C / 48T · 3.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Apple A12Z Bionic
83 %
8C / 8T · 2.49 GHz
AMD EPYC 7413
100 %
24C / 48T · 3.60 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Apple A12Z Bionic
19 %
8C / 8T · 2.49 GHz
AMD EPYC 7413
100 %
24C / 48T · 3.40 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
90 entries
90 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Apple A12Z Bionic | AMD EPYC 7413 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Apple A series (27) | AMD EPYC (147) |
| CPU group | Apple A12/A12X/A12Z (3) | AMD EPYC 7003 (29) |
| Architecture | A12 | Milan (Zen 3) |
| Technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Server |
| Socket | SP3 | |
| Predecessor | Apple A10X Fusion | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Apple A12Z Bionic | AMD EPYC 7413 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 24 / 48 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | normal |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Vortex 2.49 GHz |
24x Zen 3 2.65 - 3.60 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Tempest 1.59 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 128.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Apple A12Z Bionic | AMD EPYC 7413 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Apple A12Z | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 1.13 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 32 / 512 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 6 GB | |
| Technology | 7 nm | |
| Release date | Q1/2020 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Apple A12Z Bionic | AMD EPYC 7413 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine | |
| AI specifications | 8 Neural cores @ 5 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Apple A12Z Bionic | AMD EPYC 7413 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4X-4266 (68.2 GB/s) | DDR4-3200 (204.8 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 6 GB | 4096 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | 4.0 x 128 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Apple A12Z Bionic | AMD EPYC 7413 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 W | 180 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | 200 W | |
| TDP down | 165 W | |
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Apple A12Z Bionic | AMD EPYC 7413 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | iOS | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | |
| Release date | Q1/2020 | Q1/2021 |
| Release price | 1825 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Apple A12Z Bionic is 4.2 stars (84 ratings), while AMD EPYC 7413 has received 4.0 stars (1 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
8
Apple A12Z Bionic
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
AMD EPYC 7413
24C / 48T · 3.60 GHz
Popular Comparisons
