AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) | |
CPU comparisonAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS or Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 5.20 GHz. Up to 256 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS was released in Q2/2023. The Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) has 20 cores with 20 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to 128 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) was released in Q1/2022. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 9 PRO (4) | Family | Apple M series (25) |
| AMD Ryzen 7040 (21) | CPU group | Apple M1 (9) |
| 6 | Generation | 1 |
| Phoenix (Zen 4) | Architecture | M1 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU) |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 16 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is 4.00 GHz (5.20 GHz) while the Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) has 20 CPU cores and 20 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) is at 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz). |
||
| AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Characteristic | Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) |
| 8 | Cores | 20 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 4.00 GHz (5.20 GHz) 8x Zen 4 |
A-Core | 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz) 16x Firestorm |
| -- | B-Core | 0.60 GHz (2.06 GHz) 4x Icestorm |
Artificial Intelligence and Machine LearningProcessors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Characteristic | Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) |
| AMD Ryzen AI | AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine |
| AMD dedicated AI XDNA Technology | AI specifications | 32 Neural cores @ 22 TOPS |
Internal GraphicsThe AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS or Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| AMD Radeon 780M | GPU | Apple M1 Ultra (48 Core) |
| 0.80 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.39 GHz |
| 2.80 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.30 GHz |
| 3 | GPU Generation | 1 |
| 4 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| 4 | Max. displays | 5 |
| 12 | Compute units | 768 |
| 768 | Shader | 6144 |
| Yes | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| AMD FSR | Frame Generation | No |
| 32 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB |
| 12 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| AMD Radeon 780M | GPU | Apple M1 Ultra (48 Core) |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VP8 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode | Codec AVC | Decode |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can use up to 256 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 120.0 GB/s. The Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) supports up to 128 GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 819.2 GB/s. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Characteristic | Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) |
| DDR5-4800, DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-6400, LPDDR5X-7500 | Memory | LPDDR5-6400 |
| 256 GB | Max. Memory | 128 GB |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 120.0 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 819.2 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| 8.00 MB | L2 Cache | 52.00 MB |
| 16.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 39.4 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is 54 W, while the Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) has a TDP of 60 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Characteristic | Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) |
| 54 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 60 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | 120 W |
| 35 W | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured in 4 nm and has 24.00 MB cache. The Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) is manufactured in 5 nm and has a 52.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Characteristic | Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) |
| 4 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8.5-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2,FMA3, AVX2, AVX512 | ISA extensions | Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation |
| FP8 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | Apple Virtualization Framework |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Operating systems | macOS |
| Q2/2023 | Release date | Q1/2022 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
8C 16T @ 4.00 GHz (5.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
20C 20T @ 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
8C 16T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
|
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
8C 16T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
8C 16T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
8C 16T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
Apple M1 Ultra (48 Core) @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Performance for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)
Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
|
|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
8C 16T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C 20T @ 0.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
8C 16T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
8C 16T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
8C 16T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
8C 16T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
8C 16T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
8C 16T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C 20T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU) |
| Unknown | Apple Mac Studio (2022) |
News and articles for the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and the Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
Apple M2 Pro with more CPU cores and production in 3 nm ?
Posted by Stefan on 2022-06-28
After Apple surprisingly presented the normal Apple M2 processor as the first successor to the Apple M1 already in June 2022, the Apple M2 Pro and the Apple M2 Max may follow in autumn. The difference in performance compared to the basic version could be even greater this time and range from 25 to 40 percent.
In this article we describe how Apple could realize this and why the price should also go up.
In this article we describe how Apple could realize this and why the price should also go up.
Apple M2 vs Apple M1 - What are the differences?
Posted by Stefan on 2022-06-09
During WWDC 2022 on June 6th, 2022 Apple surprisingly presented its new Apple M2 processor. This will initially be installed in a completely revised Apple MacBook Air with 13.6 inches, a even thinner form factor and new colors. Apple also updated the already known (old) Apple MacBook Pro 13.3 with touch bar.
Many leakers had counted on Apple not presenting its new second-generation M processor until the fall. But things turned out differently. And there is very likely a reason for that: the improvements in the Apple M2 are limited compared to the predecessor.
Many leakers had counted on Apple not presenting its new second-generation M processor until the fall. But things turned out differently. And there is very likely a reason for that: the improvements in the Apple M2 are limited compared to the predecessor.
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
