AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs AMD Phenom II X4 920
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | AMD Phenom II X4 920 | |
CPU comparisonAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 or AMD Phenom II X4 920 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 6 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz. Up to 64 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 was released in Q3/2017. The AMD Phenom II X4 920 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Phenom II X4 920 was released in Q1/2009. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO (28) | Family | AMD Phenom II (52) |
| AMD Ryzen 1000 (15) | CPU group | AMD Phenom II - 800/900 (23) |
| 1 | Generation | 4 |
| Summit Ridge (Zen) | Architecture | Deneb (K10) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is a 6 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.20 GHz (3.60 GHz). The AMD Phenom II X4 920 has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 920 |
| 6 | Cores | 4 |
| 12 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 3.20 GHz | Frequency | 2.80 GHz |
| 3.60 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 3.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 supports a maximum of 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Phenom II X4 920 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 920 |
| DDR4-2666 | Memory | DDR3-1333, DDR2-1066 |
| 64 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 42.7 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 16.00 MB | L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 19.7 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a TDP of 95 W, that of the AMD Phenom II X4 920 is 125 W. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 920 |
| 95 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 125 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 95 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a 16.00 MB cache, while the AMD Phenom II X4 920 cache has a total of 6.00 MB. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 920 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | SSE3, SSE4a |
| AM4 (PGA 1331) | Socket | AM2+ |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2017 | Release date | Q1/2009 |
| 300 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
6C 12T @ 3.20 GHz (3.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
AMD Phenom II X4 920
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 920
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 920
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 920
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 920
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 920
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 920
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 920
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | AMD Phenom II X4 920 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
