AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 vs AMD EPYC 7272
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 | AMD EPYC 7272 | |
CPU comparisonAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 or AMD EPYC 7272 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has 4 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. Up to 64 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 was released in Q3/2017. The AMD EPYC 7272 has 12 cores with 24 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7272 was released in Q3/2019. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO (28) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| AMD Ryzen 1000 (15) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 1 | Generation | 2 |
| Summit Ridge (Zen) | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is 3.50 GHz (3.70 GHz) while the AMD EPYC 7272 has 12 CPU cores and 24 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7272 is at 2.90 GHz (3.20 GHz). |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7272 |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.50 GHz | Frequency | 2.90 GHz |
| 3.70 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.20 GHz |
| 3.60 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.10 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 can use up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 42.7 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7272 supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7272 |
| DDR4-2666 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 64 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 42.7 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 16.00 MB | L3 Cache | 64.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 19.7 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is 65 W, while the AMD EPYC 7272 has a TDP of 120 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7272 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 120 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 95 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 16.00 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7272 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 64.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7272 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| AM4 (PGA 1331) | Socket | SP3 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2017 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
| 265 $ | Release price | 990 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
4C 8T @ 3.50 GHz (3.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
12C 24T @ 2.90 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7272
12C 24T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
4C 8T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7272
12C 24T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
4C 8T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7272
12C 24T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7272
12C 24T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7272
12C 24T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
4C 8T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7272
12C 24T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 | AMD EPYC 7272 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
