AMD Ryzen 5 2500X vs AMD FX-4200
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | AMD FX-4200 | |
CPU comparisonAMD Ryzen 5 2500X or AMD FX-4200 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD Ryzen 5 2500X has 4 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz. Up to 64 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 5 2500X was released in Q2/2018. The AMD FX-4200 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD FX-4200 was released in Q2/2012. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 (85) | Family | AMD FX (30) |
| AMD Ryzen 2000 (9) | CPU group | AMD FX-4100/4200 (5) |
| 2 | Generation | 1 |
| Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) | Architecture | Zambezi (Bulldozer) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD Ryzen 5 2500X has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen 5 2500X is 3.60 GHz (4.00 GHz) while the AMD FX-4200 has 4 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD FX-4200 is at 3.30 GHz. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | Characteristic | AMD FX-4200 |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 3.60 GHz | Frequency | 3.30 GHz |
| 4.00 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 3.80 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD Ryzen 5 2500X can use up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 46.9 GB/s. The AMD FX-4200 supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 29.9 GB/s. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | Characteristic | AMD FX-4200 |
| DDR4-2933 | Memory | DDR3-1866 |
| 64 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 46.9 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 29.9 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 16.00 MB | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 19.7 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD Ryzen 5 2500X is 95 W, while the AMD FX-4200 has a TDP of 125 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | Characteristic | AMD FX-4200 |
| 95 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 125 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 95 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD Ryzen 5 2500X is manufactured in 12 nm and has 16.00 MB cache. The AMD FX-4200 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 8.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | Characteristic | AMD FX-4200 |
| 12 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| AM4 (PGA 1331) | Socket | AM3+ |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2018 | Release date | Q2/2012 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
4C 8T @ 3.60 GHz (4.00 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
4C 8T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
AMD FX-4200
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
4C 8T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-4200
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
4C 8T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-4200
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
4C 8T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-4200
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | AMD FX-4200 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
