AMD G-T16R vs AMD FX-9370

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD G-T16R CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD FX-9370
AMD G-T16R AMD FX-9370

CPU comparison

AMD G-T16R or AMD FX-9370 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD G-T16R has 1 cores with 1 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 0.62 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The AMD G-T16R was released in Q1/2012.

The AMD FX-9370 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD FX-9370 was released in Q3/2013.
AMD G (38) Family AMD FX (30)
AMD G (13) CPU group AMD FX-9000 (2)
1 Generation 2
Ontario (Bobcat) Architecture Vishera (Piledriver)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD G-T16R has 1 CPU cores and can calculate 1 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD G-T16R is 0.62 GHz while the AMD FX-9370 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD FX-9370 is at 4.40 GHz (4.70 GHz).

AMD G-T16R Characteristic AMD FX-9370
1 Cores 8
1 Threads 8
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? Yes
0.62 GHz Frequency 4.40 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) 4.70 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) 4.70 GHz

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

AMD G-T16R Characteristic AMD FX-9370
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The AMD G-T16R or AMD FX-9370 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

AMD Radeon HD 6250 GPU no iGPU
0.28 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
3 GPU Generation --
40 nm Technology
2 Max. displays
1 Compute units --
80 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
1 GB Max. GPU Memory --
11 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

AMD Radeon HD 6250 GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The AMD G-T16R can use up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 8.5 GB/s. The AMD FX-9370 supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 29.9 GB/s.

AMD G-T16R Characteristic AMD FX-9370
DDR3L-1066 Memory DDR3-1866
Max. Memory
1 (Single Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
8.5 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 29.9 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
1.00 MB L3 Cache 8.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD G-T16R is 4 W, while the AMD FX-9370 has a TDP of 220 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

AMD G-T16R Characteristic AMD FX-9370
4 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 220 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD G-T16R is manufactured in 40 nm and has 1.00 MB cache. The AMD FX-9370 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 8.00 MB cache.

AMD G-T16R Characteristic AMD FX-9370
40 nm Technology 32 nm
Unknown Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE3, SSE4a ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
-- Socket AM3+
AMD-V Virtualization AMD-V
No AES-NI Yes
Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q1/2012 Release date Q3/2013
-- Release price 195 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD G-T16R to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD FX-9370 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD G-T16R AMD G-T16R
1C 1T @ 0.62 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-9370
8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz
613 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD G-T16R AMD G-T16R
1C 1T @ 0.62 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-9370
8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz
3040 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD G-T16R AMD G-T16R
AMD Radeon HD 6250 @ 0.28 GHz
45 (100%)
AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-9370
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD G-T16R AMD G-T16R
1C 1T @ 0.62 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-9370
8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz
9652 (100%)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
AMD G-T16R AMD G-T16R
1C 1T @ 0.62 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-9370
8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz
787.9 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
AMD G-T16R AMD G-T16R
1C 1T @ 0.62 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-9370
8C 8T @ 4.40 GHz
1528 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD G-T16R AMD G-T16R
1C 1T @ 0.62 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-9370
8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz
699 (100%)

Devices using this processor

AMD G-T16R AMD FX-9370
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD FX-9370AMD FX-8350 AMD FX-9370 vs AMD FX-8350
2. Intel Core i7-4790KAMD FX-9370 Intel Core i7-4790K vs AMD FX-9370
3. AMD FX-8370AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-8370 vs AMD FX-9370
4. AMD FX-9370AMD FX-9590 AMD FX-9370 vs AMD FX-9590
5. AMD FX-8120AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-8120 vs AMD FX-9370
6. Intel Core i5-3570KAMD FX-9370 Intel Core i5-3570K vs AMD FX-9370
7. Intel Core i5-4690AMD FX-9370 Intel Core i5-4690 vs AMD FX-9370
8. AMD A10-5700AMD G-T16R AMD A10-5700 vs AMD G-T16R
9. Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2AMD FX-9370 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 vs AMD FX-9370
10. AMD FX-4170AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-4170 vs AMD FX-9370


back to index