AMD FX-8150 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD FX-8150 | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | |
CPU comparisonAMD FX-8150 or AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD FX-8150 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.20 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD FX-8150 was released in Q4/2011. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 6 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 was released in Q3/2017. |
||
| AMD FX (30) | Family | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO (28) |
| AMD FX-8000 (11) | CPU group | AMD Ryzen 1000 (15) |
| 2 | Generation | 1 |
| Vishera (Bulldozer) | Architecture | Summit Ridge (Zen) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD FX-8150 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD FX-8150 is 3.60 GHz (4.20 GHz) while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 6 CPU cores and 12 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is at 3.20 GHz (3.60 GHz). |
||
| AMD FX-8150 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| 8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 3.60 GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| 4.20 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.60 GHz |
| 4.20 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.40 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD FX-8150 can use up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 29.9 GB/s. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 supports up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 42.7 GB/s. |
||
| AMD FX-8150 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| DDR3-1866 | Memory | DDR4-2666 |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 29.9 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | 16.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 20 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 19.7 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD FX-8150 is 125 W, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a TDP of 95 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD FX-8150 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| 125 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 95 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 95 °C |
Technical detailsThe AMD FX-8150 is manufactured in 32 nm and has 8.00 MB cache. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 16.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD FX-8150 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| 32 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM4 (PGA 1331) |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q4/2011 | Release date | Q3/2017 |
| 140 $ | Release price | 300 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
8C 8T @ 3.60 GHz (4.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
6C 12T @ 3.20 GHz (3.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD FX-8150
8C 8T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD FX-8150
8C 8T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD FX-8150
8C 8T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD FX-8150
8C 8T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD FX-8150
8C 8T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
AMD FX-8150
8C 8T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
AMD FX-8150
8C 8T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD FX-8150
8C 8T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD FX-8150
8C 8T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD FX-8150 | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
