AMD FX-7500 vs Intel Core i5-4210U
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD FX-7500 | Intel Core i5-4210U | |
CPU comparisonAMD FX-7500 or Intel Core i5-4210U - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD FX-7500 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD FX-7500 was released in Q2/2014. The Intel Core i5-4210U has 2 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core i5-4210U was released in Q2/2014. |
||
| AMD FX | Family | Intel Core i5 |
| AMD FX-7000 | CPU group | Intel Core i 4000U |
| 3 | Generation | 4 |
| Kaveri (Steamroller) | Architecture | Haswell U |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD FX-7500 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD FX-7500 is 2.10 GHz (3.30 GHz) while the Intel Core i5-4210U has 2 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Core i5-4210U is at --. |
||
| 4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.10 GHz | Frequency | 1.70 GHz |
| 3.30 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 2.70 GHz |
| 3.30 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 2.35 GHz |
Internal GraphicsThe AMD FX-7500 or Intel Core i5-4210U has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Kaveri) | GPU | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
| 0.55 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.20 GHz |
| GPU (Turbo) | 1.00 GHz | |
| 6 | GPU Generation | 7.5 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 3 |
| 8 | Execution units | 20 |
| 512 | Shader | 160 |
| 2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 11.1 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD FX-7500 can use up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The Intel Core i5-4210U supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| DDR3-1600 | Memory | DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| L2 Cache | ||
| 4.00 MB | L3 Cache | 3.00 MB |
| PCIe version | 2.0 | |
| PCIe lanes | 12 | |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD FX-7500 is 19 W, while the Intel Core i5-4210U has a TDP of 15 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| 19 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 15 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD FX-7500 is manufactured in 28 nm and has 4.00 MB cache. The Intel Core i5-4210U is manufactured in 22 nm and has a 4.00 MB cache. |
||
| 28 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| FM2+ | Socket | BGA 1168 |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2014 | Release date | Q2/2014 |
| -- | Release price | 185 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
4C 4T @ 2.10 GHz (3.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 4T @ 1.70 GHz (2.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD FX-7500
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
2C 4T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
AMD FX-7500
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
2C 4T @ 2.35 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
AMD FX-7500
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
2C 4T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
AMD FX-7500
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
2C 4T @ 2.35 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.|
|
AMD FX-7500
AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Kaveri) @ 0.55 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
Intel HD Graphics 4400 @ 1.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.|
|
AMD FX-7500
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
2C 4T @ 2.35 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.|
|
AMD FX-7500
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
2C 4T @ 2.35 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.|
|
AMD FX-7500
4C 4T @ 2.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
2C 4T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
AMD FX-7500
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
2C 4T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
AMD FX-7500
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
2C 4T @ 2.35 GHz |
||
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
AMD FX-7500
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
2C 4T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
AMD FX-7500
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
2C 4T @ 2.35 GHz |
||
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
AMD FX-7500
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
2C 4T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
AMD FX-7500
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
2C 4T @ 2.35 GHz |
||
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.|
|
AMD FX-7500
AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Kaveri) @ 0.55 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i5-4210U
Intel HD Graphics 4400 @ 1.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD FX-7500 | Intel Core i5-4210U |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
