Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD FX-6200 vs Intel Core i5-8400H
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD FX-6200
48 %
6C / 6T · 4.10 GHz
Intel Core i5-8400H
100 %
4C / 8T · 4.20 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD FX-6200
56 %
6C / 6T · 4.10 GHz
Intel Core i5-8400H
100 %
4C / 8T · 3.70 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-6200 | Intel Core i5-8400H |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD FX (30) | Intel Core i5 (336) |
| CPU group | AMD FX-6100/6200 (3) | Intel Core i 8000H (6) |
| Architecture | Zambezi (Bulldozer) | Coffee Lake H |
| Technology | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Notebook |
| Socket | AM3+ | BGA 1440 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor | Intel Core i5-9400H |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-6200 | Intel Core i5-8400H |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 4 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 6x | 4x |
| Frequency: | 3.80 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 4.10 GHz | 4.20 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 4.10 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 8.00 MB | 8.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-6200 | Intel Core i5-8400H |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
| GPU frequency | 0.30 - 1.10 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 24 / 192 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB | |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Release date | Q2/2016 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-6200 | Intel Core i5-8400H |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-6200 | Intel Core i5-8400H |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1866 (29.9 GB/s) | DDR4-2666 (42.7 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-6200 | Intel Core i5-8400H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125 W | 45 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-6200 | Intel Core i5-8400H |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q2/2012 | Q2/2018 |
| Release price | 95 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD FX-6200 is 4.7 stars (3 ratings), while Intel Core i5-8400H has received 4.7 stars (3 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
AMD FX-6200
6C / 6T · 4.10 GHz
9
Intel Core i5-8400H
4C / 8T · 4.20 GHz
Popular Comparisons
