AMD FX-4200 vs MediaTek Helio A22
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD FX-4200 | MediaTek Helio A22 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD FX-4200 and the MediaTek Helio A22 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the AMD FX-4200 4 core processor released in Q2/2012 with the MediaTek Helio A22 which has 4 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2018. |
||
| AMD FX (30) | Family | Mediatek Helio (37) |
| AMD FX-4100/4200 (5) | CPU group | MediaTek Helio A22 (1) |
| 1 | Generation | 1 |
| Zambezi (Bulldozer) | Architecture | Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD FX-4200 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.30 GHz. The processor can compute 4 threads at the same time. The MediaTek Helio A22 clocks with 2.00 GHz, has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. |
||
| AMD FX-4200 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.30 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | PowerVR GE8300 |
| GPU frequency | 0.65 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | -- |
| Technology | 20 nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 1 |
| -- | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 10 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | PowerVR GE8300 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the AMD FX-4200, while the MediaTek Helio A22 supports a maximum of 6 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 12.8 GB/s enabled. |
||
| AMD FX-4200 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| DDR3-1866 | Memory | LPDDR4X-3200, LPDDR3-1866 |
| Max. Memory | 6 GB | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 29.9 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe AMD FX-4200 has a TDP of 125 W. The TDP of the MediaTek Helio A22 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| AMD FX-4200 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| 125 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD FX-4200 has 8.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 32 nm. The cache of MediaTek Helio A22 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 16 nm. |
||
| AMD FX-4200 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| 32 nm | Technology | 16 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | ISA extensions | -- |
| AM3+ | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2012 | Release date | Q1/2018 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD FX-4200
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
MediaTek Helio A22
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD FX-4200
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD FX-4200
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD FX-4200
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.65 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD FX-4200
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD FX-4200
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD FX-4200 | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
