AMD EPYC 9474F vs AMD Athlon X4 835

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 9474F CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD Athlon X4 835
AMD EPYC 9474F AMD Athlon X4 835

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 9474F and the AMD Athlon X4 835 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD EPYC 9474F 48 core processor released in Q4/2022 with the AMD Athlon X4 835 which has 4 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2016.
AMD EPYC (129) Family AMD Athlon (29)
AMD EPYC 9004 (21) CPU group AMD Athlon X4 (Carizzo) (2)
4 Generation 2
Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) Architecture Carizzo
Desktop / Server Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 9474F is a 48 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.60 GHz (4.10 GHz). The processor can compute 96 threads at the same time. The AMD Athlon X4 835 clocks with 3.10 GHz (3.40 GHz), has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel.

AMD EPYC 9474F Characteristic AMD Athlon X4 835
48 Cores 4
96 Threads 4
normal Core architecture normal
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
3.60 GHz Frequency 3.10 GHz
4.10 GHz Turbo Frequency (1 Core) 3.40 GHz
3.95 GHz Turbo Frequency (All Cores) 3.40 GHz

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD EPYC 9474F Characteristic AMD Athlon X4 835
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

no iGPU GPU no iGPU
GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation --
Technology
Max. displays
-- Compute units --
-- Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to 6144 GB of memory in a maximum of 12 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 9474F, while the AMD Athlon X4 835 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 34.2 GB/s enabled.

AMD EPYC 9474F Characteristic AMD Athlon X4 835
DDR5-4800 Memory DDR3-2133
6144 GB Max. Memory
12 Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
460.8 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 34.2 GB/s
Yes ECC Yes
48.00 MB L2 Cache --
256.00 MB L3 Cache 2.00 MB
5.0 PCIe version 3.0
128 PCIe lanes 8
504.1 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth 7.9 GB/s

Thermal Management

The AMD EPYC 9474F has a TDP of 360 W. The TDP of the AMD Athlon X4 835 is 65 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

AMD EPYC 9474F Characteristic AMD Athlon X4 835
360 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 65 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
400 W TDP up --
320 W TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 9474F has 304.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 5 nm. The cache of AMD Athlon X4 835 is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 28 nm.

AMD EPYC 9474F Characteristic AMD Athlon X4 835
5 nm Technology 28 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI ISA extensions SSE3
SP5 Socket FM2+
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q4/2022 Release date Q1/2016
6780 $ Release price 52 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 9474F to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD Athlon X4 835 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 9474F AMD EPYC 9474F
48C 96T @ 4.10 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Athlon X4 835 AMD Athlon X4 835
4C 4T @ 3.40 GHz
83 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 9474F AMD EPYC 9474F
48C 96T @ 3.95 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Athlon X4 835 AMD Athlon X4 835
4C 4T @ 3.40 GHz
283 (100%)

Devices using this processor

AMD EPYC 9474F AMD Athlon X4 835
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD Athlon X4 835AMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Athlon X4 835 vs AMD Athlon X4 845
2. AMD Athlon X4 835AMD Athlon II X4 860K AMD Athlon X4 835 vs AMD Athlon II X4 860K
3. AMD Phenom II X4 910AMD Athlon X4 835 AMD Phenom II X4 910 vs AMD Athlon X4 835
4. AMD Athlon II X4 740AMD Athlon X4 835 AMD Athlon II X4 740 vs AMD Athlon X4 835
5. AMD A4-4000AMD Athlon X4 835 AMD A4-4000 vs AMD Athlon X4 835
6. AMD Athlon X4 835AMD A8-5600K AMD Athlon X4 835 vs AMD A8-5600K
7. AMD E1-2200AMD Athlon X4 835 AMD E1-2200 vs AMD Athlon X4 835
8. AMD FX-8350AMD Athlon X4 835 AMD FX-8350 vs AMD Athlon X4 835
9. AMD FX-6300AMD Athlon X4 835 AMD FX-6300 vs AMD Athlon X4 835
10. AMD Athlon X4 835Intel Core i7-5750HQ AMD Athlon X4 835 vs Intel Core i7-5750HQ


back to index