AMD EPYC 9354 vs UNISOC T700

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 9354 CPU1 vs CPU2 UNISOC T700
AMD EPYC 9354 UNISOC T700

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 9354 and the UNISOC T700 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD EPYC 9354 32 core processor released in Q4/2022 with the UNISOC T700 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2021.
AMD EPYC (129) Family UNISOC 4G (10)
AMD EPYC 9004 (21) CPU group UNISOC 4G 12nm (8)
4 Generation 0
Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) Architecture --
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 9354 is a 32 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.25 GHz (3.80 GHz). The processor can compute 64 threads at the same time. The UNISOC T700 clocks with 1.80 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

AMD EPYC 9354 Characteristic UNISOC T700
32 Cores 8
64 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
3.25 GHz (3.80 GHz)
32x Zen 4
A-Core 1.80 GHz
2x Cortex-A75
-- B-Core 1.80 GHz
6x Cortex-A55

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD EPYC 9354 Characteristic UNISOC T700
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G52 MP2
GPU frequency 0.85 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation Bifrost 2
Technology 16 nm
Max. displays 2
-- Compute units 2
-- Shader 32
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G52 MP2
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to 6144 GB of memory in a maximum of 12 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 9354, while the UNISOC T700 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

AMD EPYC 9354 Characteristic UNISOC T700
DDR5-4800 Memory LPDDR4X-1866, LPDDR4-1866, LPDDR3-933
6144 GB Max. Memory
12 Memory channels 0
460.8 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
32.00 MB L2 Cache --
256.00 MB L3 Cache --
5.0 PCIe version --
128 PCIe lanes --
504.1 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The AMD EPYC 9354 has a TDP of 280 W. The TDP of the UNISOC T700 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

AMD EPYC 9354 Characteristic UNISOC T700
280 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
300 W TDP up --
240 W TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 9354 has 288.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 5 nm. The cache of UNISOC T700 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 12 nm.

AMD EPYC 9354 Characteristic UNISOC T700
5 nm Technology 12 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI ISA extensions --
SP5 Socket --
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 Operating systems Android
Q4/2022 Release date Q1/2021
3420 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 9354 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the UNISOC T700 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.5 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:


Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 9354 AMD EPYC 9354
32C 64T @ 3.80 GHz
0 (0%)
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
350 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 9354 AMD EPYC 9354
32C 64T @ 3.75 GHz
0 (0%)
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
1348 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
AMD EPYC 9354 AMD EPYC 9354
32C 64T @ 3.80 GHz
0 (0%)
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
417 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
AMD EPYC 9354 AMD EPYC 9354
32C 64T @ 3.75 GHz
0 (0%)
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
1392 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD EPYC 9354 AMD EPYC 9354
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 @ 0.85 GHz
54 (100%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD EPYC 9354 AMD EPYC 9354
32C 64T @ 3.25 GHz
0 (0%)
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
165879 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD EPYC 9354 AMD EPYC 9354
32C 64T @ 3.25 GHz
0 (0%)
UNISOC T700 UNISOC T700
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
188599 (100%)

Devices using this processor

AMD EPYC 9354 UNISOC T700
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD EPYC 9354AMD EPYC 9354P AMD EPYC 9354 vs AMD EPYC 9354P
2. UNISOC T700Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 UNISOC T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
3. UNISOC T700MediaTek Helio G37 UNISOC T700 vs MediaTek Helio G37
4. UNISOC T700MediaTek Helio G85 UNISOC T700 vs MediaTek Helio G85
5. UNISOC T700UNISOC T606 UNISOC T700 vs UNISOC T606
6. AMD EPYC 9354AMD EPYC 9374F AMD EPYC 9354 vs AMD EPYC 9374F
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4GUNISOC T700 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G vs UNISOC T700
8. UNISOC T700Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 UNISOC T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
9. UNISOC T700MediaTek Helio G80 UNISOC T700 vs MediaTek Helio G80
10. UNISOC T700MediaTek Helio P35 UNISOC T700 vs MediaTek Helio P35


back to index