AMD EPYC 8324P vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8368

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 8324P and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD EPYC 8324P 32 core processor released in Q3/2023 with the Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 which has 38 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2021.

The AMD EPYC 8324P is a 32 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.65 GHz (3.00 GHz). The processor can compute 64 threads at the same time. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 clocks with 2.40 GHz (3.40 GHz), has 38 CPU cores and can calculate 76 threads in parallel.

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 6 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 8324P, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 supports a maximum of 6144 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s enabled.

The AMD EPYC 8324P has a TDP of 180 W. The TDP of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 is 270 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

The AMD EPYC 8324P has 128.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 5 nm. The cache of Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 is at 57.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 10 nm.