AMD EPYC 7713 vs Intel Xeon W-2175
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 7713 | Intel Xeon W-2175 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 7713 or Intel Xeon W-2175 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 7713 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.68 GHz. Up to 4096 GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7713 was released in Q1/2021. The Intel Xeon W-2175 has 14 cores with 28 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to 512 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-2175 was released in Q3/2017. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Intel Xeon W (83) |
| AMD EPYC 7003 (29) | CPU group | Intel Xeon W-2100/3100 (15) |
| 3 | Generation | 6 |
| Milan (Zen 3) | Architecture | Skylake W |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | Intel Xeon W-2275 |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7713 has 64 CPU cores and can calculate 128 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7713 is 2.00 GHz (3.68 GHz) while the Intel Xeon W-2175 has 14 CPU cores and 28 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon W-2175 is at 2.50 GHz (4.30 GHz). |
||
| AMD EPYC 7713 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-2175 |
| 64 | Cores | 14 |
| 128 | Threads | 28 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.00 GHz | Frequency | 2.50 GHz |
| 3.68 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 4.30 GHz |
| 3.00 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.60 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 7713 can use up to 4096 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 204.8 GB/s. The Intel Xeon W-2175 supports up to 512 GB of memory in 4 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 85.4 GB/s. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7713 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-2175 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | DDR4-2666 |
| 4096 GB | Max. Memory | 512 GB |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| 204.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 85.4 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | 19.00 MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | 48 |
| 252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 47.3 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 7713 is 225 W, while the Intel Xeon W-2175 has a TDP of 140 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7713 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-2175 |
| 225 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 140 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 240 W | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7713 is manufactured in 7 nm and has 256.00 MB cache. The Intel Xeon W-2175 is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 19.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7713 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-2175 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 |
| SP3 | Socket | LGA 2066 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q1/2021 | Release date | Q3/2017 |
| 7060 $ | Release price | 1947 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz (3.68 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
14C 28T @ 2.50 GHz (4.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 7713
64C 128T @ 3.68 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon W-2175
14C 28T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7713
64C 128T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-2175
14C 28T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7713
64C 128T @ 3.68 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-2175
14C 28T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7713
64C 128T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-2175
14C 28T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7713
64C 128T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-2175
14C 28T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7713
64C 128T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-2175
14C 28T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7713
64C 128T @ 3.68 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-2175
14C 28T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7713
64C 128T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-2175
14C 28T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 7713 | Intel Xeon W-2175 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
