AMD EPYC 7702 vs AMD Athlon X4 845

Last updated: 2023-04-27

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 7702		AMD Athlon X4 845
CPU comparison AMD EPYC 7702 or AMD Athlon X4 845 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The AMD EPYC 7702 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7702 was released in Q3/2019. The AMD Athlon X4 845 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Athlon X4 845 was released in Q1/2016.

AMD EPYC (129)	Family	AMD Athlon (29)
AMD EPYC 7002 (24)	CPU group	AMD Athlon X4 (Carizzo) (2)
2	Generation	2
Rome (Zen 2)	Architecture	Carizzo
Desktop / Server	Segment	Desktop / Server
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	--

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The AMD EPYC 7702 is a 64 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz). The AMD Athlon X4 845 has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.50 GHz (3.80 GHz).
AMD EPYC 7702	Characteristic	AMD Athlon X4 845
64	Cores	4
128	Threads	4
normal	Core architecture	normal
Yes	Hyperthreading	No
No	Overclocking ?	No
2.00 GHz	Frequency	3.50 GHz
3.35 GHz	Turbo Frequency (1 Core)	3.80 GHz
2.50 GHz	Turbo Frequency (All Cores)	3.80 GHz


NPU AI performance The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.
AMD EPYC 7702	Characteristic	AMD Athlon X4 845
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--
--	NPU + CPU + iGPU	--

Integrated graphics (iGPU) The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
	GPU frequency	--
--	GPU (Turbo)	--
--	GPU Generation	--
	Technology
	Max. displays
--	Compute units	--
--	Shader	--
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
--	Max. GPU Memory	--
--	DirectX Version	--

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
No	Codec h264	No
No	Codec VP9	No
No	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
No	Codec AVC	No
No	Codec VC-1	No
No	Codec JPEG	No

Memory & PCIe The AMD EPYC 7702 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD Athlon X4 845 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels.
AMD EPYC 7702	Characteristic	AMD Athlon X4 845
DDR4-3200	Memory	DDR3-2133
	Max. Memory
8 (Octa Channel)	Memory channels	2 (Dual Channel)
51.2 GB/s	Max. Bandwidth	34.2 GB/s
Yes	ECC	Yes
--	L2 Cache	--
256.00 MB	L3 Cache	2.00 MB
4.0	PCIe version	3.0
128	PCIe lanes	8
252.0 GB/s	PCIe Bandwidth	7.9 GB/s
Thermal Management The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 7702 has a TDP of 200 W, that of the AMD Athlon X4 845 is 65 W.
AMD EPYC 7702	Characteristic	AMD Athlon X4 845
200 W	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	65 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	--
--	TDP down	--
--	Tjunction max.	--
Technical details The AMD EPYC 7702 has a 256.00 MB cache, while the AMD Athlon X4 845 cache has a total of 2.00 MB.

AMD EPYC 7702	Characteristic	AMD Athlon X4 845
7 nm	Technology	28 nm
Chiplet	Chip design	Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3	ISA extensions	SSE3
SP3	Socket	FM2+
AMD-V, SVM	Virtualization	None
Yes	AES-NI	No
Windows 10, Linux	Operating systems	Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2019	Release date	Q1/2016
8000 $	Release price	65 $

show more data		show more data

AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save! AMD Athlon X4 845 4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz (3.80 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks

AMD EPYC 7702 (100%)

AMD Athlon X4 845 (55%)

⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks

AMD EPYC 7702 (100%)

AMD Athlon X4 845 (5%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz	1079 (100%)
	AMD Athlon X4 845 4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz	603 (56%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	37461 (100%)
	AMD Athlon X4 845 4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz	1832 (5%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz	1317 (100%)
	AMD Athlon X4 845 4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz	695 (53%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	70617 (100%)
	AMD Athlon X4 845 4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz	3794 (5%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz	996 (100%)
	AMD Athlon X4 845 4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	49035 (100%)
	AMD Athlon X4 845 4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz	0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Athlon X4 845 4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz	1772 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz	391 (100%)
	AMD Athlon X4 845 4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	18857 (100%)
	AMD Athlon X4 845 4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz	0 (0%)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	403.9 (100%)
	AMD Athlon X4 845 4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Athlon X4 845 4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz	93 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Athlon X4 845 4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz	316 (100%)

Devices using this processor
AMD EPYC 7702	AMD Athlon X4 845
Unknown	Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs


1.		AMD Athlon II X4 860K vs AMD Athlon X4 845
2.		AMD Athlon X4 845 vs AMD A8-7600
3.		AMD Athlon X4 845 vs Intel Pentium G4400
4.		AMD Athlon X4 845 vs AMD FX-4300
5.		AMD Ryzen 3 1200 vs AMD Athlon X4 845
6.		Intel Core i3-6100 vs AMD Athlon X4 845
7.		AMD EPYC 7742 vs AMD EPYC 7702
8.		AMD Athlon X4 845 vs AMD FX-6300
9.		AMD Ryzen 3 1300X vs AMD Athlon X4 845
10.		AMD Athlon X4 845 vs AMD FX-4100