AMD EPYC 7401 vs Samsung Exynos 880
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 7401 | Samsung Exynos 880 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 7401 or Samsung Exynos 880 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 7401 has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7401 was released in Q3/2017. The Samsung Exynos 880 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 880 was released in Q2/2020. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| AMD EPYC 7001 (12) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 800 (2) |
| 1 | Generation | 4 |
| Naples (Zen) | Architecture | Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7401 has 24 CPU cores and can calculate 48 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7401 is 2.00 GHz (3.00 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 880 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 880 is at 2.00 GHz. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7401 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
| 24 | Cores | 8 |
| 48 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.00 GHz (3.00 GHz) | A-Core | 2.00 GHz 2x Cortex-A77 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.80 GHz 6x Cortex-A55 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The AMD EPYC 7401 or Samsung Exynos 880 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP5 |
| GPU frequency | 0.72 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.72 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Bifrost 3 |
| Technology | 7 nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 5 |
| -- | Shader | 80 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP5 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 7401 can use up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 170.6 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 880 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7401 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
| DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666 | Memory | LPDDR4X |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 170.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 64.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 126.1 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 7401 is 170 W, while the Samsung Exynos 880 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7401 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
| 170 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7401 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 64.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 880 is manufactured in 8 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7401 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 880 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 8 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | -- |
| SP3 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2017 | Release date | Q2/2020 |
| 1450 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
24C 48T @ 2.00 GHz (3.00 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 7401
24C 48T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7401
24C 48T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7401
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 880
ARM Mali-G76 MP5 @ 0.72 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7401
24C 48T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7401
24C 48T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7401
24C 48T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 880
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 7401 | Samsung Exynos 880 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
