AMD EPYC 7352 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8164
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 7352 | Intel Xeon Platinum 8164 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 7352 or Intel Xeon Platinum 8164 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 7352 has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7352 was released in Q3/2019. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8164 has 26 cores with 52 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to 768 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8164 was released in Q3/2017. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Intel Xeon Platinum (89) |
| AMD EPYC 7002 (24) | CPU group | Intel Xeon Platinum 8100 (16) |
| 2 | Generation | 1 |
| Rome (Zen 2) | Architecture | Skylake |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7352 is a 24 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz (3.20 GHz). The Intel Xeon Platinum 8164 has 26 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz (3.70 GHz). |
||
| AMD EPYC 7352 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Platinum 8164 |
| 24 | Cores | 26 |
| 48 | Threads | 52 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.30 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| 3.20 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.70 GHz |
| 2.70 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 2.60 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 7352 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8164 can connect up to 768 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7352 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Platinum 8164 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | DDR4-2666 |
| Max. Memory | 768 GB | |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 6 (Hexa Channel) |
| 51.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 128.00 MB | L3 Cache | 36.00 MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | 48 |
| 252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 47.3 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 7352 has a TDP of 155 W, that of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8164 is 150 W. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7352 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Platinum 8164 |
| 155 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 150 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7352 has a 128.00 MB cache, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8164 cache has a total of 36.00 MB. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7352 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Platinum 8164 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 |
| SP3 | Socket | LGA 3647 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2019 | Release date | Q3/2017 |
| 2750 $ | Release price | 6100 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
24C 48T @ 2.30 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
26C 52T @ 2.00 GHz (3.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8164
26C 52T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8164
26C 52T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8164
26C 52T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8164
26C 52T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8164
26C 52T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8164
26C 52T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 7352 | Intel Xeon Platinum 8164 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
