AMD Athlon II X2 210e vs AMD A10-6700
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD Athlon II X2 210e | AMD A10-6700 | |
CPU comparisonAMD Athlon II X2 210e or AMD A10-6700 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD Athlon II X2 210e has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Athlon II X2 210e was released in Q3/2010. The AMD A10-6700 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD A10-6700 was released in Q2/2013. |
||
| AMD Athlon II (52) | Family | AMD A (112) |
| AMD Athlon II X2 (Propus) (18) | CPU group | AMD A10-6000 (4) |
| 1 | Generation | 3 |
| Propus | Architecture | Richland (Piledriver) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD Athlon II X2 210e has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD Athlon II X2 210e is 2.60 GHz while the AMD A10-6700 has 4 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD A10-6700 is at 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz). |
||
| AMD Athlon II X2 210e | Characteristic | AMD A10-6700 |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.60 GHz | Frequency | 3.70 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 4.30 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 4.30 GHz |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The AMD Athlon II X2 210e or AMD A10-6700 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | AMD Radeon HD 8670D |
| GPU frequency | 0.84 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | 5 |
| Technology | 32 nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 6 |
| -- | Shader | 384 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11.2 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | AMD Radeon HD 8670D |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD Athlon II X2 210e can use up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 21.3 GB/s. The AMD A10-6700 supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 29.9 GB/s. |
||
| AMD Athlon II X2 210e | Characteristic | AMD A10-6700 |
| DDR3-1333 | Memory | DDR3-1866 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 21.3 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 29.9 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| 2.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 4.00 MB |
| 2.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD Athlon II X2 210e is 45 W, while the AMD A10-6700 has a TDP of 65 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD Athlon II X2 210e | Characteristic | AMD A10-6700 |
| 45 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 65 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD Athlon II X2 210e is manufactured in 45 nm and has 2.00 MB cache. The AMD A10-6700 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 4.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD Athlon II X2 210e | Characteristic | AMD A10-6700 |
| 45 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| MMX, 3DNow!, SSE3, SSE4a | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 |
| AM3 | Socket | FM2 |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2010 | Release date | Q2/2013 |
| -- | Release price | 120 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD Athlon II X2 210e
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
AMD A10-6700
4C 4T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 210e
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A10-6700
4C 4T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 210e
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A10-6700
4C 4T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 210e
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A10-6700
AMD Radeon HD 8670D @ 0.84 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 210e
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A10-6700
4C 4T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 210e
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A10-6700
4C 4T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD Athlon II X2 210e | AMD A10-6700 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
