AMD A4-6250 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD A4-6250 CPU1 vs CPU2 HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G
AMD A4-6250 HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G

CPU comparison

AMD A4-6250 or HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD A4-6250 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD A4-6250 was released in .

The HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.22 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G was released in Q1/2021.
AMD A (112) Family HiSilicon Kirin (29)
Unknown M (4) CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 810/820 (3)
0 Generation 6
Unknown Architecture Cortex-A76 / Cortex-A55
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD A4-6250 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.22 GHz.

AMD A4-6250 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G
4 Cores 8
4 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.00 GHz A-Core 2.22 GHz
3x Cortex-A76
-- B-Core 1.84 GHz
3x Cortex-A55

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD A4-6250 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G
-- AI hardware HUAWEI HiAI 2.0
-- AI specifications Da Vinci Architecture. Ascend D110 Lite
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

Unknown GPU ARM Mali-G57 MP6
GPU frequency 0.85 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation Vallhall 1
Technology 7 nm
0 Max. displays 2
-- Compute units 6
-- Shader 96
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Unknown GPU ARM Mali-G57 MP6
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 Decode
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The AMD A4-6250 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G can connect up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels.

AMD A4-6250 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G
DDR3-1600 Memory LPDDR4X-2133
Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
25.6 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
2.00 MB L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 2.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD A4-6250 has a TDP of 25 W, that of the HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G is 6 W.

AMD A4-6250 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G
25 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 6 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD A4-6250 has a 2.00 MB cache, while the HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G cache has a total of 2.00 MB.

AMD A4-6250 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G
Technology 7 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
Unknown ISA extensions --
BGA 769 Socket --
Unknown Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Operating systems Android
Release date Q1/2021
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD A4-6250 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD A4-6250 AMD A4-6250
Unknown @ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G
ARM Mali-G57 MP6 @ 0.85 GHz
653 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD A4-6250 AMD A4-6250
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G
8C 8T @ 2.22 GHz
351366 (100%)

Devices using this processor

AMD A4-6250 HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G
Unknown Huawei Nova 7 SE
Huawei Nova 8

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 778G HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
2. HiSilicon Kirin 820 5GHiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G
3. HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 662 HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
4. HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5GMediaTek Dimensity 900 HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
5. HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5GApple A13 Bionic HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G vs Apple A13 Bionic
6. HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 720G HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
7. HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 780G HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
8. HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5GMediaTek Dimensity 800U HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
9. HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 765G HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
10. HiSilicon Kirin 990 5GHiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 820E 5G


back to index