AMD A10-6700 vs Samsung Exynos 9825

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD A10-6700 CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 9825
AMD A10-6700 Samsung Exynos 9825

CPU comparison

AMD A10-6700 or Samsung Exynos 9825 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD A10-6700 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD A10-6700 was released in Q2/2013.

The Samsung Exynos 9825 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.73 GHz. The CPU supports up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9825 was released in Q3/2019.
AMD A (112) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
AMD A10-6000 (4) CPU group Samsung Exynos 9825 (1)
3 Generation 3
Richland (Piledriver) Architecture Exynos M4/Cortex-A75/-A55
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD A10-6700 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 9825 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.73 GHz.

AMD A10-6700 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9825
4 Cores 8
4 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) A-Core 2.73 GHz
2x Exynos M4
-- B-Core 2.31 GHz
2x Cortex-A75
-- C-Core 1.95 GHz
4x Cortex-A55

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD A10-6700 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9825
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

AMD Radeon HD 8670D GPU ARM Mali-G76 MP12
0.84 GHz GPU frequency 0.70 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
5 GPU Generation Bifrost 3
32 nm Technology 7 nm
2 Max. displays 2
6 Compute units 12
384 Shader 192
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
11.2 DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

AMD Radeon HD 8670D GPU ARM Mali-G76 MP12
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The AMD A10-6700 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9825 can connect up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels.

AMD A10-6700 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9825
DDR3-1866 Memory LPDDR4X-1866
Max. Memory 12 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
29.9 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache 1.50 MB
4.00 MB L3 Cache 2.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD A10-6700 has a TDP of 65 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 9825 is --.

AMD A10-6700 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9825
65 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD A10-6700 has a 4.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 9825 cache has a total of 3.50 MB.

AMD A10-6700 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9825
32 nm Technology 7 nm
Unknown Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 ISA extensions --
FM2 Socket --
AMD-V Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q2/2013 Release date Q3/2019
120 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD A10-6700 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.7 stars (3 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9825 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.5 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD A10-6700 (73%)
Samsung Exynos 9825 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD A10-6700 (84%)
Samsung Exynos 9825 (89%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD A10-6700 AMD A10-6700
4C 4T @ 4.30 GHz
533 (73%)
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
731 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD A10-6700 AMD A10-6700
4C 4T @ 4.30 GHz
1431 (68%)
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
2098 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD A10-6700 AMD A10-6700
AMD Radeon HD 8670D @ 0.84 GHz
648 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
ARM Mali-G76 MP12 @ 0.70 GHz
607 (94%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD A10-6700 AMD A10-6700
4C 4T @ 4.30 GHz
4736 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
3714 (78%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
AMD A10-6700 AMD A10-6700
4C 4T @ 4.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
806 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
AMD A10-6700 AMD A10-6700
4C 4T @ 4.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
2069 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD A10-6700 AMD A10-6700
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
455970 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD A10-6700 AMD A10-6700
4C 4T @ 4.30 GHz
67 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD A10-6700 AMD A10-6700
4C 4T @ 4.30 GHz
257 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9825 Samsung Exynos 9825
8C 8T @ 2.73 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

AMD A10-6700 Samsung Exynos 9825
Unknown Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Galaxy Note10+

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GSamsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
2. AMD A10-6700Intel Core i5-4440 AMD A10-6700 vs Intel Core i5-4440
3. Samsung Exynos 9825Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Samsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GSamsung Exynos 9825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
6. AMD A10-7800AMD A10-6700 AMD A10-7800 vs AMD A10-6700
7. Samsung Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos 990 Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Samsung Exynos 990
8. AMD A10-6700AMD A8-6500 AMD A10-6700 vs AMD A8-6500
9. AMD A10-6700AMD A10-5700 AMD A10-6700 vs AMD A10-5700
10. Intel Core i7-4770AMD A10-6700 Intel Core i7-4770 vs AMD A10-6700


back to index