Samsung Exynos 7570 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Samsung Exynos 7570 | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | |
CPU comparisonSamsung Exynos 7570 or AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Samsung Exynos 7570 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.40 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 7570 was released in Q3/2016. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 6 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 was released in Q3/2017. |
||
| Samsung Exynos (47) | Family | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO (28) |
| Samsung Exynos 7570/7870/7880 (4) | CPU group | AMD Ryzen 1000 (15) |
| 1 | Generation | 1 |
| Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Summit Ridge (Zen) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung Exynos 7570 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.40 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 6 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.20 GHz (3.60 GHz). |
||
| Samsung Exynos 7570 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 1.40 GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.60 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.40 GHz |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| ARM Mali-T720 MP1 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.60 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 0.60 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Midgard 3 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 28nm | Technology | |
| 2 | Max. displays | |
| 1 | Compute units | -- |
| 16 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-T720 MP1 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Samsung Exynos 7570 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 can connect up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 7570 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| LPDDR3-1066 | Memory | DDR4-2666 |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | |
| 0 | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 1.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 16.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 20 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 19.7 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Samsung Exynos 7570 has a TDP of --, that of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is 95 W. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 7570 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 95 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 95 °C |
Technical detailsThe Samsung Exynos 7570 has a 1.00 MB cache, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 cache has a total of 16.00 MB. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 7570 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| -- | Socket | AM4 (PGA 1331) |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2016 | Release date | Q3/2017 |
| -- | Release price | 300 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
6C 12T @ 3.20 GHz (3.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
ARM Mali-T720 MP1 @ 0.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Samsung Exynos 7570 | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
