Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Apple A16 Bionic (5-CPU 4-GPU)
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Samsung Exynos 1380
38 %
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
5C / 5T · 3.46 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Samsung Exynos 1380
45 %
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
5C / 5T · 3.46 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Samsung Exynos 1380
42 %
ARM Mali-G68 MP5
Apple A16 (4 GPU Cores)
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 1380 | Apple A16 Bionic (5-CPU 4-GPU) |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Samsung Exynos (49) | Apple A series (27) |
| CPU group | Samsung Exynos 1300 (2) | Apple A16 (2) |
| Architecture | Cortex-A78/-A55 | A16 |
| Technology | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU) | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 1380 | Apple A16 Bionic (5-CPU 4-GPU) |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 5 / 5 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Cortex-A78 2.40 GHz |
2x Everest 3.46 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Cortex-A55 2.00 GHz |
3x Sawtooth 2.02 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 20.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 24.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 1380 | Apple A16 Bionic (5-CPU 4-GPU) |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-G68 MP5 | Apple A16 (4 GPU Cores) |
| GPU frequency | 0.95 GHz | 0.40 - 1.34 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 5 / 80 | 16 / 512 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 6 GB | |
| Technology | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2020 | Q1/2025 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 1380 | Apple A16 Bionic (5-CPU 4-GPU) |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine | |
| AI specifications | 16 Neural cores @ 17 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 1380 | Apple A16 Bionic (5-CPU 4-GPU) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5 LPDDR4X | LPDDR5-6400 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 6 GB | |
| Memory channels | 0 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 1380 | Apple A16 Bionic (5-CPU 4-GPU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 1380 | Apple A16 Bionic (5-CPU 4-GPU) |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Android, Windows ARM | iOS |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | Armv8.6-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q1/2023 | Q1/2025 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Samsung Exynos 1380 is 3.7 stars (137 ratings), while Apple A16 Bionic (5-CPU 4-GPU) has received 3.8 stars (19 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
Apple A19
6C / 6T · 4.26 GHz
8
Apple A16 Bionic (5-CPU 4-GPU)
5C / 5T · 0.00 GHz
9
Samsung Exynos 1380
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
