MediaTek MT8165 vs AMD Phenom II X4 920
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| MediaTek MT8165 | AMD Phenom II X4 920 | |
CPU comparisonMediaTek MT8165 or AMD Phenom II X4 920 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The MediaTek MT8165 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The MediaTek MT8165 was released in Q4/2014. The AMD Phenom II X4 920 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Phenom II X4 920 was released in Q1/2009. |
||
| Mediatek MT-Serie (72) | Family | AMD Phenom II (52) |
| MediaTek MT816x (4) | CPU group | AMD Phenom II - 800/900 (23) |
| 1 | Generation | 4 |
| Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Deneb (K10) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe MediaTek MT8165 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.50 GHz. The AMD Phenom II X4 920 has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz. |
||
| MediaTek MT8165 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 920 |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 1.50 GHz | Frequency | 2.80 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| ARM Mali-T760 MP2 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.01 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 0.01 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Midgard 3 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 28nm | Technology | |
| 2 | Max. displays | |
| 2 | Compute units | -- |
| 32 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-T760 MP2 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe MediaTek MT8165 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The AMD Phenom II X4 920 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| MediaTek MT8165 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 920 |
| LPDDR3-800, DDR3-800 | Memory | DDR3-1333, DDR2-1066 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 1 (Single Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 6.4 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The MediaTek MT8165 has a TDP of --, that of the AMD Phenom II X4 920 is 125 W. |
||
| MediaTek MT8165 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 920 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 125 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe MediaTek MT8165 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the AMD Phenom II X4 920 cache has a total of 6.00 MB. |
||
| MediaTek MT8165 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 920 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE3, SSE4a |
| -- | Socket | AM2+ |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q4/2014 | Release date | Q1/2009 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 4T @ 1.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
MediaTek MT8165
4C 4T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
|
AMD Phenom II X4 920
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
MediaTek MT8165
4C 4T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 920
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
MediaTek MT8165
4C 4T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 920
4C 4T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| MediaTek MT8165 | AMD Phenom II X4 920 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
