MediaTek Helio X10 vs Samsung Exynos 3475
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| MediaTek Helio X10 | Samsung Exynos 3475 | |
CPU comparisonMediaTek Helio X10 or Samsung Exynos 3475 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The MediaTek Helio X10 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. Up to 4 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The MediaTek Helio X10 was released in Q3/2014. The Samsung Exynos 3475 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 3475 was released in 2015. |
||
| Mediatek Helio (37) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| MediaTek Helio X10 (1) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 3400 (2) |
| 1 | Generation | 3 |
| Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Cortex-A7 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe MediaTek Helio X10 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz. The Samsung Exynos 3475 has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.30 GHz. |
||
| MediaTek Helio X10 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| 8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.00 GHz | Frequency | 1.30 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| PowerVR G6200 | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP1 |
| 0.70 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.60 GHz |
| 0.70 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.60 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 3 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 28nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 2 |
| 2 | Compute units | 1 |
| 32 | Shader | 16 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 10 | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| PowerVR G6200 | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP1 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe MediaTek Helio X10 supports a maximum of 4 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 3475 can connect up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. |
||
| MediaTek Helio X10 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| LPDDR3-1866 | Memory | LPDDR3-400 |
| 4 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 14.9 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The MediaTek Helio X10 has a TDP of --, that of the Samsung Exynos 3475 is --. |
||
| MediaTek Helio X10 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe MediaTek Helio X10 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 3475 cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| MediaTek Helio X10 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | -- |
| -- | Socket | -- |
| None | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Android | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2014 | Release date | 2015 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
MediaTek Helio X10
PowerVR G6200 @ 0.70 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
ARM Mali-T720 MP1 @ 0.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
MediaTek Helio X10
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
MediaTek Helio X10
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
MediaTek Helio X10
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| MediaTek Helio X10 | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
