MediaTek Helio P25 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| MediaTek Helio P25 | HiSilicon Kirin 955 | |
CPU comparisonMediaTek Helio P25 or HiSilicon Kirin 955 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The MediaTek Helio P25 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz. Up to 6 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The MediaTek Helio P25 was released in Q2/2017. The HiSilicon Kirin 955 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 955 was released in Q2/2016. |
||
| Mediatek Helio (37) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| MediaTek Helio P20/P30 (4) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 950 (2) |
| 2 | Generation | 4 |
| Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Cortex-A72 / Cortex-A53 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe MediaTek Helio P25 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the MediaTek Helio P25 is 2.60 GHz while the HiSilicon Kirin 955 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 955 is at 2.50 GHz. |
||
| MediaTek Helio P25 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 955 |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.60 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
A-Core | 2.50 GHz 4x Cortex-A72 |
| 1.60 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
B-Core | 1.80 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The MediaTek Helio P25 or HiSilicon Kirin 955 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| ARM Mali-T880 MP2 | GPU | ARM Mali-T880 MP4 |
| 1.00 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.90 GHz |
| 1.00 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.90 GHz |
| Midgard 4 | GPU Generation | Midgard 4 |
| 16 nm | Technology | 16 nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 2 |
| 2 | Compute units | 4 |
| 32 | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11 | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-T880 MP2 | GPU | ARM Mali-T880 MP4 |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe MediaTek Helio P25 can use up to 6 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 12.8 GB/s. The HiSilicon Kirin 955 supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| MediaTek Helio P25 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 955 |
| LPDDR4X-1600, LPDDR4-1600, LPDDR3-933 | Memory | LPDDR4, LPDDR3 |
| 6 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 12.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the MediaTek Helio P25 is --, while the HiSilicon Kirin 955 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| MediaTek Helio P25 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 955 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe MediaTek Helio P25 is manufactured in 16 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The HiSilicon Kirin 955 is manufactured in 16 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache. |
||
| MediaTek Helio P25 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 955 |
| 16 nm | Technology | 16 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | -- |
| -- | Socket | -- |
| None | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Android | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2017 | Release date | Q2/2016 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
MediaTek Helio P25
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 955
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
MediaTek Helio P25
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 955
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
MediaTek Helio P25
ARM Mali-T880 MP2 @ 1.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 955
ARM Mali-T880 MP4 @ 0.90 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
MediaTek Helio P25
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 955
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
MediaTek Helio P25
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 955
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| MediaTek Helio P25 | HiSilicon Kirin 955 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
