Intel Xeon W-3323 vs Samsung Exynos 5420
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3323 | Samsung Exynos 5420 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon W-3323 or Samsung Exynos 5420 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon W-3323 has 12 cores with 24 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. Up to 4096 GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3323 was released in Q3/2021. The Samsung Exynos 5420 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.90 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 5420 was released in Q3/2013. |
||
| Intel Xeon W (83) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Xeon W-3300 (5) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 5260/5410/5420/5422/5800 (5) |
| 8 | Generation | 3 |
| Ice Lake W | Architecture | Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| Intel Xeon W-3223 | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon W-3323 has 12 CPU cores and can calculate 24 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon W-3323 is 3.50 GHz (3.90 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 5420 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 5420 is at 1.90 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3323 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5420 |
| 12 | Cores | 8 |
| 24 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.50 GHz (3.90 GHz) | A-Core | 1.90 GHz 4x Cortex-A15 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.30 GHz 4x Cortex-A7 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The Intel Xeon W-3323 or Samsung Exynos 5420 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 |
| GPU frequency | 0.53 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 2 |
| Technology | 32nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 6 |
| -- | Shader | 96 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon W-3323 can use up to 4096 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 204.8 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 5420 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3323 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5420 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | LPDDR3e-933 |
| 4096 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 204.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| 15.00 MB | L2 Cache | 2.50 MB |
| 21.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 64 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 126.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon W-3323 is 220 W, while the Samsung Exynos 5420 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3323 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5420 |
| 220 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon W-3323 is manufactured in 10 nm and has 36.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 5420 is manufactured in 28 nm and has a 2.50 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3323 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5420 |
| 10 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 4189 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2021 | Release date | Q3/2013 |
| 949 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
12C 24T @ 3.50 GHz (3.90 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
Intel Xeon W-3323
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 5420
ARM Mali-T628 MP6 @ 0.53 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3323
12C 24T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5420
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3323 | Samsung Exynos 5420 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
