Intel Xeon W-1390 vs Samsung Exynos 980
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon W-1390 | Samsung Exynos 980 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon W-1390 or Samsung Exynos 980 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon W-1390 has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 5.20 GHz. Up to 128 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-1390 was released in Q2/2021. The Samsung Exynos 980 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 980 was released in Q4/2019. |
||
| Intel Xeon W (83) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Xeon W-1300 (7) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 980 (1) |
| 11 | Generation | 4 |
| Rocket Lake S | Architecture | Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon W-1390 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz (5.20 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 980 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-1390 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.80 GHz (5.20 GHz) | A-Core | 2.20 GHz 2x Cortex-A77 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.80 GHz 6x Cortex-A55 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| Intel UHD Graphics P750 | GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP5 |
| 0.35 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.72 GHz |
| 1.30 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.72 GHz |
| 12 | GPU Generation | Bifrost 3 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| 3 | Max. displays | 2 |
| 64 | Compute units | 5 |
| 256 | Shader | 80 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 32 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Intel UHD Graphics P750 | GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP5 |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon W-1390 supports a maximum of 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 980 can connect up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-1390 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| 128 GB | Max. Memory | 12 GB |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| 51.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| 16.00 MB | L2 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 39.4 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon W-1390 has a TDP of 80 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 980 is --. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-1390 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| 80 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon W-1390 has a 16.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 980 cache has a total of 2.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-1390 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 8 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 1200 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2021 | Release date | Q4/2019 |
| 494 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 16T @ 2.80 GHz (5.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
Intel Xeon W-1390
Intel UHD Graphics P750 @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 980
ARM Mali-G76 MP5 @ 0.72 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-1390
8C 16T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-1390
8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 980
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon W-1390 | Samsung Exynos 980 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
