Intel Xeon W-1290T vs Samsung Exynos 7578
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon W-1290T | Samsung Exynos 7578 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Xeon W-1290T and the Samsung Exynos 7578 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Intel Xeon W-1290T 10 core processor released in Q2/2020 with the Samsung Exynos 7578 which has 4 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2015. |
||
| Intel Xeon W (83) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Xeon W-1200 (13) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 7578/7580 (2) |
| 10 | Generation | 1 |
| Comet Lake W | Architecture | Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon W-1290T is a 10 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.90 GHz (4.70 GHz). The processor can compute 20 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 7578 clocks with 1.50 GHz, has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-1290T | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7578 |
| 10 | Cores | 4 |
| 20 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.90 GHz | Frequency | 1.50 GHz |
| 4.70 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 2.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP2 |
| 0.35 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.65 GHz |
| 1.20 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.65 GHz |
| 9.5 | GPU Generation | Midgard 3 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 28nm |
| 3 | Max. displays | 2 |
| 24 | Compute units | 2 |
| 192 | Shader | 32 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 64 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP2 |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to 128 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Xeon W-1290T, while the Samsung Exynos 7578 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-1290T | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7578 |
| DDR4-2933 | Memory | LPDDR3-1066 |
| 128 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 46.9 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| 20.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 15.8 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe Intel Xeon W-1290T has a TDP of 35 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 7578 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-1290T | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7578 |
| 35 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon W-1290T has 20.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 7578 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 28 nm. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-1290T | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7578 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 1200 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2020 | Release date | Q2/2015 |
| 494 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
10C 20T @ 1.90 GHz (4.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 1.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
Intel Xeon W-1290T
Intel UHD Graphics P630 @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 7578
ARM Mali-T720 MP2 @ 0.65 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-1290T
10C 20T @ 4.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7578
4C 4T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-1290T
10C 20T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7578
4C 4T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-1290T
10C 20T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7578
4C 4T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon W-1290T | Samsung Exynos 7578 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
