Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL vs HiSilicon Kirin 928

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL CPU1 vs CPU2 HiSilicon Kirin 928
Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL HiSilicon Kirin 928

CPU comparison

Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL or HiSilicon Kirin 928 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL has 28 cores with 56 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.30 GHz. Up to 4608 GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL was released in Q2/2020.

The HiSilicon Kirin 928 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 928 was released in Q3/2014.
Intel Xeon Platinum (89) Family HiSilicon Kirin (29)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8300 (CL) (10) CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 920 (3)
3 Generation 2
Cooper Lake Architecture Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL has 28 CPU cores and can calculate 56 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL is 2.60 GHz (4.30 GHz) while the HiSilicon Kirin 928 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 928 is at 2.00 GHz.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 928
28 Cores 8
56 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.60 GHz (4.30 GHz) A-Core 2.00 GHz
4x Cortex-A15
-- B-Core 1.30 GHz
4x Cortex-A7

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 928
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL or HiSilicon Kirin 928 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-T628 MP4
GPU frequency 0.60 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.60 GHz
-- GPU Generation Midgard 2
Technology 32nm
Max. displays 1
-- Compute units 4
-- Shader 64
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-T628 MP4
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL can use up to 4608 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 153.6 GB/s. The HiSilicon Kirin 928 supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 928
DDR4-3200 Memory LPDDR3-1600
4608 GB Max. Memory
6 (Hexa Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
153.6 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
38.50 MB L3 Cache --
3.0 PCIe version --
48 PCIe lanes --
47.3 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL is 205 W, while the HiSilicon Kirin 928 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 928
205 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL is manufactured in 14 nm and has 38.50 MB cache. The HiSilicon Kirin 928 is manufactured in 28 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 928
14 nm Technology 28 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv7-A (32 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 ISA extensions --
LGA 4189 Socket --
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q2/2020 Release date Q3/2014
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 928 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 928 HiSilicon Kirin 928
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 @ 0.60 GHz
77 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL HiSilicon Kirin 928
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD Ryzen 9 5950XIntel Xeon Platinum 8376HL AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL
2. Intel Core i7-9850HLIntel Xeon Platinum 8376HL Intel Core i7-9850HL vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL
3. Apple M1HiSilicon Kirin 928 Apple M1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 928
4. Intel Pentium Gold G6605Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL Intel Pentium Gold G6605 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL
5. HiSilicon Kirin 928Intel Core i7-3517UE HiSilicon Kirin 928 vs Intel Core i7-3517UE
6. Intel Core i7-1165G7HiSilicon Kirin 928 Intel Core i7-1165G7 vs HiSilicon Kirin 928
7. HiSilicon Kirin 928MediaTek Dimensity 1100 HiSilicon Kirin 928 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
8. AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AFIntel Xeon Platinum 8376HL AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662HiSilicon Kirin 928 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs HiSilicon Kirin 928
10. AMD Ryzen 7 3700XIntel Xeon Platinum 8376HL AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL


back to index