Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 vs Samsung Exynos 7580
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 | Samsung Exynos 7580 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon E5-2658 v3 or Samsung Exynos 7580 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 has 12 cores with 24 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.90 GHz. Up to 768 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 was released in Q3/2014. The Samsung Exynos 7580 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 7580 was released in Q2/2015. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5 (71) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Xeon E5 v3 (32) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 7578/7580 (2) |
| 5 | Generation | 1 |
| Haswell E | Architecture | Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 is a 12 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz (2.90 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 7580 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.60 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| 12 | Cores | 8 |
| 24 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.20 GHz | Frequency | 1.60 GHz |
| 2.90 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 2.50 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP2 |
| GPU frequency | 0.65 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.65 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 3 |
| Technology | 28nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 2 |
| -- | Shader | 32 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP2 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 supports a maximum of 768 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 7580 can connect up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| DDR4-2133 | Memory | LPDDR3-933 |
| 768 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 68.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| 30.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 40 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 39.4 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 has a TDP of 105 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 7580 is --. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| 105 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 has a 30.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 7580 cache has a total of 2.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| 22 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 2011-3 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2014 | Release date | Q2/2015 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
12C 24T @ 2.20 GHz (2.90 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3
12C 24T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3
12C 24T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3
12C 24T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
ARM Mali-T720 MP2 @ 0.65 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3
12C 24T @ 2.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3
12C 24T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
