Intel Xeon D-1735TR vs Samsung Exynos 4212
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon D-1735TR | Samsung Exynos 4212 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon D-1735TR or Samsung Exynos 4212 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon D-1735TR has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. Up to 384 GB of memory is supported in 3 memory channels. The Intel Xeon D-1735TR was released in Q1/2022. The Samsung Exynos 4212 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.50 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 4212 was released in Q3/2011. |
||
| Intel Xeon D (79) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Xeon D-1700 (20) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 4212 (1) |
| 4 | Generation | 2 |
| Ice Lake | Architecture | Cortex-A9 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon D-1735TR is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz (3.40 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 4212 has 2 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.50 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon D-1735TR | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| 8 | Cores | 2 |
| 16 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.20 GHz | Frequency | 1.50 GHz |
| 3.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 2.60 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.40 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.40 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Utgard |
| Technology | 28nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 0 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon D-1735TR supports a maximum of 384 GB of memory in 3 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 4212 can connect up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Xeon D-1735TR | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| DDR4-2933 | Memory | LPDDR2-400 |
| 384 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 3 | Memory channels | 0 |
| 70.4 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| 15.00 MB | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 31.5 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon D-1735TR has a TDP of 59 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 4212 is --. |
||
| Intel Xeon D-1735TR | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| 59 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon D-1735TR has a 15.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 4212 cache has a total of 1.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Xeon D-1735TR | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| 10 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | -- |
| BGA 2227 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q1/2022 | Release date | Q3/2011 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
8C 16T @ 2.20 GHz (3.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon D-1735TR
8C 16T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon D-1735TR
8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Xeon D-1735TR
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 4212
ARM Mali-400 MP4 @ 0.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon D-1735TR | Samsung Exynos 4212 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
