Intel Pentium E6800 vs Samsung Exynos 3475
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Pentium E6800 | Samsung Exynos 3475 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Pentium E6800 or Samsung Exynos 3475 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Pentium E6800 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.33 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Pentium E6800 was released in Q3/2010. The Samsung Exynos 3475 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 3475 was released in 2015. |
||
| Intel Pentium (150) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Pentium E5000/E6000 (13) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 3400 (2) |
| 2 | Generation | 3 |
| Wolfdale (Penryn) | Architecture | Cortex-A7 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Pentium E6800 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Pentium E6800 is 3.33 GHz while the Samsung Exynos 3475 has 4 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 3475 is at 1.30 GHz. |
||
| Intel Pentium E6800 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.33 GHz | Frequency | 1.30 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The Intel Pentium E6800 or Samsung Exynos 3475 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP1 |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.60 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 3 |
| Technology | 28nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 1 |
| -- | Shader | 16 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP1 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Pentium E6800 can use up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 21.3 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 3475 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Pentium E6800 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| DDR3-1333, DDR2-800 | Memory | LPDDR3-400 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 21.3 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| 2.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Pentium E6800 is 65 W, while the Samsung Exynos 3475 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Pentium E6800 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Pentium E6800 is manufactured in 45 nm and has 2.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 3475 is manufactured in 28 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Pentium E6800 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| 45 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 775 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2010 | Release date | 2015 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 3.33 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Pentium E6800
2C 2T @ 3.33 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Pentium E6800
2C 2T @ 3.33 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Pentium E6800
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
ARM Mali-T720 MP1 @ 0.60 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Pentium E6800
2C 2T @ 3.33 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Pentium E6800 | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
