Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 vs Samsung Exynos 7570
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 | Samsung Exynos 7570 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Core 2 Quad Q9700 or Samsung Exynos 7570 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 was released in Q1/2010. The Samsung Exynos 7570 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.40 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 7570 was released in Q3/2016. |
||
| Intel Core2 Quad (19) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q8000/Q9000 (16) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 7570/7870/7880 (4) |
| 2 | Generation | 1 |
| Yorkfield (Penryn) | Architecture | Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 is 3.20 GHz while the Samsung Exynos 7570 has 4 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 7570 is at 1.40 GHz. |
||
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7570 |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.20 GHz | Frequency | 1.40 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 or Samsung Exynos 7570 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP1 |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.60 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 3 |
| Technology | 28nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 1 |
| -- | Shader | 16 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP1 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 can use up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 17.1 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 7570 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7570 |
| DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | Memory | LPDDR3-1066 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 17.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| 6.00 MB | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 is 95 W, while the Samsung Exynos 7570 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7570 |
| 95 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 is manufactured in 45 nm and has 6.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 7570 is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7570 |
| 45 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 775 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q1/2010 | Release date | Q3/2016 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
4C 4T @ 3.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
4C 4T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
4C 4T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
4C 4T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
4C 4T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
4C 4T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7570
ARM Mali-T720 MP1 @ 0.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 | Samsung Exynos 7570 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
