Intel Atom C3858 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Atom C3858 | Samsung Exynos 9609 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Atom C3858 or Samsung Exynos 9609 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Atom C3858 has 12 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. Up to 256 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Atom C3858 was released in Q3/2017. The Samsung Exynos 9609 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9609 was released in Q2/2019. |
||
| Intel Atom (108) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Atom C3000 (20) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) |
| 5 | Generation | 3 |
| Denverton | Architecture | Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Atom C3858 is a 12 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz. The Samsung Exynos 9609 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz. |
||
| Intel Atom C3858 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 12 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.00 GHz | A-Core | 2.20 GHz 4x Cortex-A73 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.60 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | Bifrost 2 |
| Technology | 16 nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 3 |
| -- | Shader | 48 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Atom C3858 supports a maximum of 256 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9609 can connect up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Atom C3858 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| DDR4-2400 | Memory | LPDDR4X-1600 |
| 256 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 38.4 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| 12.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 15.8 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Atom C3858 has a TDP of 25 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 9609 is --. |
||
| Intel Atom C3858 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 25 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Atom C3858 has a 12.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 9609 cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Atom C3858 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | ISA extensions | -- |
| BGA 1310 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2017 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
| 332 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
12C 12T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Atom C3858
12C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Atom C3858
12C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Atom C3858
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Intel Atom C3858
12C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9609
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Atom C3858 | Samsung Exynos 9609 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
