Intel Atom C2550 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Atom C2550 | HiSilicon Kirin 658 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Atom C2550 and the HiSilicon Kirin 658 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Intel Atom C2550 4 core processor released in Q3/2013 with the HiSilicon Kirin 658 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2016. |
||
| Intel Atom (108) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| Intel Atom C2000 (7) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 650 (4) |
| 3 | Generation | 4 |
| Avoton | Architecture | Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Atom C2550 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.40 GHz (2.60 GHz). The processor can compute 4 threads at the same time. The HiSilicon Kirin 658 clocks with 2.35 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. |
||
| Intel Atom C2550 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 658 |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.40 GHz (2.60 GHz) | A-Core | 2.35 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.70 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T830 MP2 |
| GPU frequency | 0.90 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 4 |
| Technology | 28nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 2 |
| -- | Shader | 32 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T830 MP2 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeUp to 64 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Atom C2550, while the HiSilicon Kirin 658 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled. |
||
| Intel Atom C2550 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 658 |
| DDR3L-1600, DDR3-1600 | Memory | LPDDR3-933 |
| 64 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 25.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 2.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 2.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 8.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe Intel Atom C2550 has a TDP of 14 W. The TDP of the HiSilicon Kirin 658 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| Intel Atom C2550 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 658 |
| 14 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Atom C2550 has 2.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 22 nm. The cache of HiSilicon Kirin 658 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 16 nm. |
||
| Intel Atom C2550 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 658 |
| 22 nm | Technology | 16 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | ISA extensions | -- |
| BGA 1283 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2013 | Release date | Q2/2016 |
| 74 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 4T @ 2.40 GHz (2.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Atom C2550
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Atom C2550
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Atom C2550
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 658
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 @ 0.90 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Atom C2550
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Atom C2550 | HiSilicon Kirin 658 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
