HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 | |
CPU comparisonHiSilicon Kirin 9000 or Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.13 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 was released in Q4/2020. The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.66 GHz. The CPU supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 was released in Q3/2008. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Family | Intel Core2 Quad (19) |
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (2) | CPU group | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8000/Q9000 (16) |
| 9 | Generation | 2 |
| Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 | Architecture | Yorkfield (Penryn) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is 3.13 GHz while the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 has 4 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 is at 2.66 GHz. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000 | Characteristic | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
| 8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 4 |
| hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.13 GHz 1x Cortex-A77 |
A-Core | 2.66 GHz |
| 2.54 GHz 3x Cortex-A77 |
B-Core | -- |
| 2.05 GHz 4x Cortex-A55 |
C-Core | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 or Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| ARM Mali-G78 MP24 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.76 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Vallhall 2 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 5 nm | Technology | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| 24 | Compute units | -- |
| 384 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 12 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-G78 MP24 | GPU | no iGPU |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| Decode | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe HiSilicon Kirin 9000 can use up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 17.1 GB/s. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000 | Characteristic | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
| LPDDR5-2750, LPDDR4X-2133 | Memory | DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is --, while the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 has a TDP of 95 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000 | Characteristic | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 95 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is manufactured in 5 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 is manufactured in 45 nm and has a 6.00 MB cache. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000 | Characteristic | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
| 5 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1 |
| -- | Socket | LGA 775 |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q4/2020 | Release date | Q3/2008 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 2.66 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
4C 4T @ 2.66 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
4C 4T @ 2.66 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
ARM Mali-G78 MP24 @ 0.76 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
4C 4T @ 2.66 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
4C 4T @ 2.66 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
4C 4T @ 2.66 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
4C 4T @ 2.66 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
