HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs Intel Celeron 1020E
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 655 | Intel Celeron 1020E | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the HiSilicon Kirin 655 and the Intel Celeron 1020E and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the HiSilicon Kirin 655 8 core processor released in Q2/2016 with the Intel Celeron 1020E which has 2 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2013. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Family | Intel Celeron (165) |
| HiSilicon Kirin 650 (4) | CPU group | Intel Celeron 1000 (9) |
| 4 | Generation | 3 |
| Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Ivy Bridge U |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe HiSilicon Kirin 655 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.12 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The Intel Celeron 1020E clocks with 2.20 GHz, has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 655 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 1020E |
| 8 | Cores | 2 |
| 8 | Threads | 2 |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.12 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
A-Core | 2.20 GHz |
| 1.70 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
B-Core | -- |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| ARM Mali-T830 MP2 | GPU | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) |
| 0.90 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.65 GHz |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 1.00 GHz |
| Midgard 4 | GPU Generation | 7 |
| 28nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 3 |
| 2 | Compute units | 6 |
| 32 | Shader | 48 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| 11 | DirectX Version | 11.0 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-T830 MP2 | GPU | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the HiSilicon Kirin 655, while the Intel Celeron 1020E supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s enabled. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 655 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 1020E |
| LPDDR3-933 | Memory | DDR3L-1600, DDR3-1600 |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 2.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 8.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe HiSilicon Kirin 655 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the Intel Celeron 1020E is 35 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 655 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 1020E |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 35 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 105 °C |
Technical detailsThe HiSilicon Kirin 655 has 0.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 16 nm. The cache of Intel Celeron 1020E is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 22 nm. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 655 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 1020E |
| 16 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| -- | Socket | BGA 1023 |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2016 | Release date | Q1/2013 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 2.12 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
HiSilicon Kirin 655
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 @ 0.90 GHz |
||
|
Intel Celeron 1020E
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 1.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 655
8C 8T @ 2.12 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 1020E
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 655
8C 8T @ 2.12 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 1020E
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 655
8C 8T @ 2.12 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 1020E
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 655 | Intel Celeron 1020E |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
