HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs AMD FX-4150
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 650 | AMD FX-4150 | |
CPU comparisonHiSilicon Kirin 650 or AMD FX-4150 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The HiSilicon Kirin 650 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 650 was released in Q2/2016. The AMD FX-4150 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.10 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD FX-4150 was released in Q2/2012. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Family | AMD FX (30) |
| HiSilicon Kirin 650 (4) | CPU group | AMD FX-4100/4200 (5) |
| 4 | Generation | 1 |
| Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Zambezi (Bulldozer) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe HiSilicon Kirin 650 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 650 is 2.00 GHz while the AMD FX-4150 has 4 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD FX-4150 is at 3.90 GHz (4.10 GHz). |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 650 | Characteristic | AMD FX-4150 |
| 8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 4 |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 2.00 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
A-Core | 3.90 GHz (4.10 GHz) |
| 1.70 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
B-Core | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The HiSilicon Kirin 650 or AMD FX-4150 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| ARM Mali-T830 MP2 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.90 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Midgard 4 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 28nm | Technology | |
| 2 | Max. displays | |
| 2 | Compute units | -- |
| 32 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-T830 MP2 | GPU | no iGPU |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe HiSilicon Kirin 650 can use up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The AMD FX-4150 supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 29.9 GB/s. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 650 | Characteristic | AMD FX-4150 |
| LPDDR3-933 | Memory | DDR3-1866 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 29.9 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the HiSilicon Kirin 650 is --, while the AMD FX-4150 has a TDP of 95 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 650 | Characteristic | AMD FX-4150 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 95 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe HiSilicon Kirin 650 is manufactured in 16 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The AMD FX-4150 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 8.00 MB cache. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 650 | Characteristic | AMD FX-4150 |
| 16 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| -- | Socket | AM3+ |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2016 | Release date | Q2/2012 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 3.90 GHz (4.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
AMD FX-4150
4C 4T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-4150
4C 4T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 650
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 @ 0.90 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-4150
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-4150
4C 4T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 650 | AMD FX-4150 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
