Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Apple A9 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Apple A9
100 %
2C / 2T · 1.85 GHz
8C / 8T · 2.00 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Apple A9
79 %
2C / 2T · 1.85 GHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.00 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Apple A9
100 %
2C / 2T · 1.85 GHz
8C / 8T · 2.00 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Apple A9
77 %
2C / 2T · 1.85 GHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.00 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Apple A9
91 %
Apple A9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
100 %
Qualcomm Adreno 610
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
Apple A9
97 %
2C / 2T · 1.85 GHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.00 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Apple A9 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Apple A series (27) | Qualcomm Snapdragon (105) |
| CPU group | Apple A9/A9X (2) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662/665 (2) |
| Architecture | A9 | Kryo 260 |
| Technology | 16 nm | 11 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Apple A8 | |
| Successor | Apple A10 Fusion |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Apple A9 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x Twister 1.85 GHz |
4x Kryo 260 Gold 2.00 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Kryo 260 Silver 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 3.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Apple A9 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Apple A9 | Qualcomm Adreno 610 |
| GPU frequency | 0.65 GHz | 0.00 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 24 / 192 | / 128 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 0 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Technology | 16 nm | 11 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2015 | Q2/2019 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Apple A9 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Qualcomm AI engine | |
| AI specifications | Hexagon 683 | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Apple A9 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) | LPDDR4X-3733 (29.8 GB/s) LPDDR3-1866 (15.0 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Apple A9 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 5 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Apple A9 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | iOS | Android |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q3/2015 | Q1/2020 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Apple A9 is 3.8 stars (38 ratings), while Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 has received 3.1 stars (28 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
8
Apple A9
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
