Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
8C / 8T · 3.00 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
8C / 8T · 3.00 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
8C / 8T · 3.00 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
8C / 8T · 3.00 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Apple A14 Bionic
77 %
Apple A14
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
100 %
ARM Mali-G77 MP9
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
Multi-core performance
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
8C / 8T · 3.00 GHz
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.00 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Apple A series (27) | Mediatek Dimensity (38) |
| CPU group | Apple A14 (1) | MediaTek Dimensity 1100/1200/1300 (3) |
| Architecture | A14 (Firestorm/Icestorm) | Cortex-A78 / Cortex-A55 |
| Technology | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Apple A13 Bionic | |
| Successor | Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x Firestorm 3.00 GHz |
1x Cortex-A78 3.00 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Icestorm 1.82 GHz |
3x Cortex-A78 2.60 GHz |
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A55 2.00 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 12.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 16.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Apple A14 | ARM Mali-G77 MP9 |
| GPU frequency | 1.46 GHz | 0.85 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 16 / 256 | 9 / 144 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2020 | Q2/2019 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine | |
| AI specifications | 16 Neural cores @ 11 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4X-4266 (34.1 GB/s) | LPDDR4X-4266 (34.1 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 1 | 4 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7.25 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | iOS | Android |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q3/2020 | Q1/2021 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Apple A14 Bionic is 3.9 stars (242 ratings), while MediaTek Dimensity 1200 has received 4.5 stars (20 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
7
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
Apple A14 Bionic
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
