AMD Ryzen 7 3700C vs Samsung Exynos 7580
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700C | Samsung Exynos 7580 | |
CPU comparisonAMD Ryzen 7 3700C or Samsung Exynos 7580 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700C has 4 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz. Up to 64 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 7 3700C was released in Q3/2020. The Samsung Exynos 7580 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 7580 was released in Q2/2015. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 (70) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| AMD Ryzen 3000C (3) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 7578/7580 (2) |
| 3 | Generation | 1 |
| Picasso (Zen+) | Architecture | Cortex-A53 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5825C | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD Ryzen 7 3700C is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz (4.00 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 7580 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.60 GHz. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700C | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.30 GHz | Frequency | 1.60 GHz |
| 4.00 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 2.70 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (Raven Ridge) | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP2 |
| 1.40 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.65 GHz |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.65 GHz |
| 8 | GPU Generation | Midgard 3 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 28nm |
| 3 | Max. displays | 2 |
| 10 | Compute units | 2 |
| 640 | Shader | 32 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (Raven Ridge) | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP2 |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD Ryzen 7 3700C supports a maximum of 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 7580 can connect up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700C | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| DDR4-2666 | Memory | LPDDR3-933 |
| 64 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 42.7 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| 2.00 MB | L2 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| 4.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 19.7 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD Ryzen 7 3700C has a TDP of 15 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 7580 is --. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700C | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| 15 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 25 W | TDP up | -- |
| 12 W | TDP down | -- |
| 105 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD Ryzen 7 3700C has a 6.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 7580 cache has a total of 2.00 MB. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700C | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| 12 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | -- |
| FP5 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2020 | Release date | Q2/2015 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
4C 8T @ 2.30 GHz (4.00 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C
4C 8T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C
4C 8T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (Raven Ridge) @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
ARM Mali-T720 MP2 @ 0.65 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C
4C 8T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C
4C 8T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C
4C 8T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C
4C 8T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C
4C 8T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700C | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
