AMD Phenom II X4 810 vs Samsung Exynos 7270

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD Phenom II X4 810 CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 7270
AMD Phenom II X4 810 Samsung Exynos 7270

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD Phenom II X4 810 and the Samsung Exynos 7270 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD Phenom II X4 810 4 core processor released in Q1/2009 with the Samsung Exynos 7270 which has 2 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2016.
AMD Phenom II (52) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
AMD Phenom II - 800/900 (23) CPU group Samsung Exynos 7570/7870/7880 (4)
4 Generation 1
Deneb (K10) Architecture Cortex-A53
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD Phenom II X4 810 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.60 GHz. The processor can compute 4 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 7270 clocks with 1.00 GHz, has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel.

AMD Phenom II X4 810 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 7270
4 Cores 2
4 Threads 2
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
Yes Overclocking ? No
2.60 GHz Frequency 1.00 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD Phenom II X4 810 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 7270
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-T720 MP1
GPU frequency 0.60 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.60 GHz
-- GPU Generation Midgard 3
Technology 28nm
Max. displays 2
-- Compute units 1
-- Shader 16
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-T720 MP1
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the AMD Phenom II X4 810, while the Samsung Exynos 7270 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

AMD Phenom II X4 810 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 7270
DDR3-1333, DDR2-1066 Memory LPDDR3-667
Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 0
21.3 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
4.00 MB L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The AMD Phenom II X4 810 has a TDP of 95 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 7270 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

AMD Phenom II X4 810 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 7270
95 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD Phenom II X4 810 has 4.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 45 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 7270 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 14 nm.

AMD Phenom II X4 810 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 7270
45 nm Technology 14 nm
Unknown Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE3, SSE4a ISA extensions --
AM3 Socket --
AMD-V Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q1/2009 Release date Q3/2016
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD Phenom II X4 810 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 7270 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD Phenom II X4 810 AMD Phenom II X4 810
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz
357 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7270 Samsung Exynos 7270
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD Phenom II X4 810 AMD Phenom II X4 810
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz
1231 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7270 Samsung Exynos 7270
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD Phenom II X4 810 AMD Phenom II X4 810
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 7270 Samsung Exynos 7270
ARM Mali-T720 MP1 @ 0.60 GHz
10 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD Phenom II X4 810 AMD Phenom II X4 810
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz
1850 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7270 Samsung Exynos 7270
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD Phenom II X4 810 AMD Phenom II X4 810
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz
68 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7270 Samsung Exynos 7270
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD Phenom II X4 810 AMD Phenom II X4 810
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz
263 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7270 Samsung Exynos 7270
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

AMD Phenom II X4 810 Samsung Exynos 7270
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD Phenom II X6 1055TAMD Phenom II X4 810 AMD Phenom II X6 1055T vs AMD Phenom II X4 810
2. AMD Phenom II X4 810AMD FX-8320 AMD Phenom II X4 810 vs AMD FX-8320
3. AMD Phenom II X4 810AMD FX-4300 AMD Phenom II X4 810 vs AMD FX-4300
4. AMD Phenom II X4 810AMD Athlon II X2 340 AMD Phenom II X4 810 vs AMD Athlon II X2 340
5. AMD Phenom II X6 1035TAMD Phenom II X4 810 AMD Phenom II X6 1035T vs AMD Phenom II X4 810
6. AMD A6-3600AMD Phenom II X4 810 AMD A6-3600 vs AMD Phenom II X4 810
7. AMD Phenom II X2 B59AMD Phenom II X4 810 AMD Phenom II X2 B59 vs AMD Phenom II X4 810
8. Intel Core i7-5820KAMD Phenom II X4 810 Intel Core i7-5820K vs AMD Phenom II X4 810
9. AMD Phenom II X4 810Intel Pentium G4500 AMD Phenom II X4 810 vs Intel Pentium G4500
10. Intel Celeron G1840AMD Phenom II X4 810 Intel Celeron G1840 vs AMD Phenom II X4 810


back to index