AMD GX-210JA vs MediaTek MT6570

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD GX-210JA CPU1 vs CPU2 MediaTek MT6570
AMD GX-210JA MediaTek MT6570

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD GX-210JA and the MediaTek MT6570 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD GX-210JA 2 core processor released in Q2/2013 with the MediaTek MT6570 which has 2 CPU cores and was introduced in 2015.
AMD G (38) Family Mediatek MT-Serie (72)
AMD G-Series 1st Gen (9) CPU group MediaTek MT65xx A7 (14)
1 Generation 1
Temash (Jaguar) Architecture Cortex-A9
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD GX-210JA is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.00 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The MediaTek MT6570 clocks with 1.30 GHz, has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel.

AMD GX-210JA Characteristic MediaTek MT6570
2 Cores 2
2 Threads 2
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
Yes Overclocking ? No
1.00 GHz Frequency 1.30 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD GX-210JA Characteristic MediaTek MT6570
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

AMD Radeon HD 8180 GPU ARM Mali-400
0.23 GHz GPU frequency 0.01 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.01 GHz
5 GPU Generation Utgard
28 nm Technology 28nm
2 Max. displays 1
2 Compute units 1
128 Shader 16
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory --
11.1 DirectX Version 0

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

AMD Radeon HD 8180 GPU ARM Mali-400
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to 16 GB of memory in a maximum of 1 memory channels is supported by the AMD GX-210JA, while the MediaTek MT6570 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

AMD GX-210JA Characteristic MediaTek MT6570
DDR3L-1066 Memory LPDDR2
16 GB Max. Memory
1 (Single Channel) Memory channels 0
8.6 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
1.00 MB L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache --
2.0 PCIe version --
8 PCIe lanes --
4.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The AMD GX-210JA has a TDP of 6 W. The TDP of the MediaTek MT6570 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

AMD GX-210JA Characteristic MediaTek MT6570
6 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
90 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD GX-210JA has 1.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 28 nm. The cache of MediaTek MT6570 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 28 nm.

AMD GX-210JA Characteristic MediaTek MT6570
28 nm Technology 28 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv7-A (32 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 ISA extensions --
FT3 Socket --
AMD-V Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q2/2013 Release date 2015
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD GX-210JA to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the MediaTek MT6570 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD GX-210JA AMD GX-210JA
AMD Radeon HD 8180 @ 0.23 GHz
58 (100%)
MediaTek MT6570 MediaTek MT6570
ARM Mali-400 @ 0.01 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD GX-210JA AMD GX-210JA
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
252 (100%)
MediaTek MT6570 MediaTek MT6570
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

AMD GX-210JA MediaTek MT6570
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD GX-210JAIntel Celeron J4105 AMD GX-210JA vs Intel Celeron J4105
2. MediaTek Helio P20MediaTek MT6570 MediaTek Helio P20 vs MediaTek MT6570
3. MediaTek MT6570Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550s MediaTek MT6570 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550s
4. MediaTek MT6570MediaTek Helio G88 MediaTek MT6570 vs MediaTek Helio G88
5. MediaTek MT6570Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G MediaTek MT6570 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6. Intel Core i5-1135G7AMD GX-210JA Intel Core i5-1135G7 vs AMD GX-210JA
7. Samsung Exynos 2100MediaTek MT6570 Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek MT6570
8. Samsung Exynos 850MediaTek MT6570 Samsung Exynos 850 vs MediaTek MT6570
9. AMD GX-210JARaspberry Pi 4 B (Broadcom BCM2711) AMD GX-210JA vs Raspberry Pi 4 B (Broadcom BCM2711)
10. AMD GX-210JAAMD Ryzen 9 5900 AMD GX-210JA vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900


back to index