AMD GX-210JA vs Intel Atom C5310

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD GX-210JA CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Atom C5310
AMD GX-210JA Intel Atom C5310

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD GX-210JA and the Intel Atom C5310 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD GX-210JA 2 core processor released in Q2/2013 with the Intel Atom C5310 which has 4 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2022.
AMD G (38) Family Intel Atom (108)
AMD G-Series 1st Gen (9) CPU group Intel Atom C5000 (5)
1 Generation 6
Temash (Jaguar) Architecture Parker Ridge
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD GX-210JA is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.00 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The Intel Atom C5310 clocks with 1.60 GHz, has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel.

AMD GX-210JA Characteristic Intel Atom C5310
2 Cores 4
2 Threads 4
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
Yes Overclocking ? No
1.00 GHz Frequency 1.60 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD GX-210JA Characteristic Intel Atom C5310
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

AMD Radeon HD 8180 GPU no iGPU
0.23 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
5 GPU Generation --
28 nm Technology
2 Max. displays
2 Compute units --
128 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory --
11.1 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

AMD Radeon HD 8180 GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to 16 GB of memory in a maximum of 1 memory channels is supported by the AMD GX-210JA, while the Intel Atom C5310 supports a maximum of 256 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s enabled.

AMD GX-210JA Characteristic Intel Atom C5310
DDR3L-1066 Memory DDR4-2400
16 GB Max. Memory 256 GB
1 (Single Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
8.6 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 38.4 GB/s
Yes ECC Yes
1.00 MB L2 Cache 9.00 MB
-- L3 Cache --
2.0 PCIe version 3.0
8 PCIe lanes 12
4.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth 11.8 GB/s

Thermal Management

The AMD GX-210JA has a TDP of 6 W. The TDP of the Intel Atom C5310 is 32 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

AMD GX-210JA Characteristic Intel Atom C5310
6 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 32 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
90 °C Tjunction max. 100 °C

Technical details

The AMD GX-210JA has 1.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 28 nm. The cache of Intel Atom C5310 is at 9.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 10 nm.

AMD GX-210JA Characteristic Intel Atom C5310
28 nm Technology 10 nm
Monolithic Chip design Monolithic
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, Intel QAT
FT3 Socket BGA 2106
AMD-V Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Yes AES-NI Yes
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q2/2013 Release date Q2/2022
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD GX-210JA to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Atom C5310 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD GX-210JA AMD GX-210JA
AMD Radeon HD 8180 @ 0.23 GHz
58 (100%)
Intel Atom C5310 Intel Atom C5310
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD GX-210JA AMD GX-210JA
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
252 (100%)
Intel Atom C5310 Intel Atom C5310
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

AMD GX-210JA Intel Atom C5310
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD GX-210JAIntel Celeron J4105 AMD GX-210JA vs Intel Celeron J4105
2. Intel Core i5-1135G7AMD GX-210JA Intel Core i5-1135G7 vs AMD GX-210JA
3. AMD GX-210JARaspberry Pi 4 B (Broadcom BCM2711) AMD GX-210JA vs Raspberry Pi 4 B (Broadcom BCM2711)
4. AMD GX-210JAAMD Ryzen 9 5900 AMD GX-210JA vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900
5. AMD GX-210JAIntel Core i9-12900F AMD GX-210JA vs Intel Core i9-12900F
6. AMD Ryzen 3 4300UAMD GX-210JA AMD Ryzen 3 4300U vs AMD GX-210JA
7. Intel Atom C5310Samsung Exynos 7884 Intel Atom C5310 vs Samsung Exynos 7884
8. AMD E-240AMD GX-210JA AMD E-240 vs AMD GX-210JA
9. Intel Atom C5310Intel Core i5-12500HL Intel Atom C5310 vs Intel Core i5-12500HL
10. Intel Atom C5310Intel Atom C5115 Intel Atom C5310 vs Intel Atom C5115


back to index