AMD G-T40N vs Intel Atom C3808
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD G-T40N | Intel Atom C3808 | |
CPU comparisonAMD G-T40N or Intel Atom C3808 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD G-T40N has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.00 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The AMD G-T40N was released in Q1/2011. The Intel Atom C3808 has 12 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to 256 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Atom C3808 was released in Q3/2017. |
||
| AMD G (38) | Family | Intel Atom (108) |
| AMD G (13) | CPU group | Intel Atom C3000 (20) |
| 1 | Generation | 5 |
| Ontario (Bobcat) | Architecture | Denverton |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD G-T40N has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD G-T40N is 1.00 GHz while the Intel Atom C3808 has 12 CPU cores and 12 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Atom C3808 is at 2.00 GHz. |
||
| AMD G-T40N | Characteristic | Intel Atom C3808 |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.00 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The AMD G-T40N or Intel Atom C3808 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| AMD Radeon HD 6250 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.28 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 3 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 40 nm | Technology | |
| 2 | Max. displays | |
| 1 | Compute units | -- |
| 80 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 1 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| AMD Radeon HD 6250 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD G-T40N can use up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 8.5 GB/s. The Intel Atom C3808 supports up to 256 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 34.1 GB/s. |
||
| AMD G-T40N | Characteristic | Intel Atom C3808 |
| DDR3L-1066 | Memory | DDR4-2133 |
| Max. Memory | 256 GB | |
| 1 (Single Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 8.5 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | 12.00 MB |
| 1.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD G-T40N is 9 W, while the Intel Atom C3808 has a TDP of 25 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD G-T40N | Characteristic | Intel Atom C3808 |
| 9 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 25 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe AMD G-T40N is manufactured in 40 nm and has 1.00 MB cache. The Intel Atom C3808 is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 12.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD G-T40N | Characteristic | Intel Atom C3808 |
| 40 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE3, SSE4a | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| -- | Socket | BGA 1310 |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Q1/2011 | Release date | Q3/2017 |
| -- | Release price | 369 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
12C 12T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD G-T40N
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz |
||
|
Intel Atom C3808
12C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD G-T40N
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom C3808
12C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD G-T40N
AMD Radeon HD 6250 @ 0.28 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom C3808
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD G-T40N
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom C3808
12C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD G-T40N | Intel Atom C3808 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
