AMD Athlon II X2 260u vs Samsung Exynos 3475
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD Athlon II X2 260u | Samsung Exynos 3475 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD Athlon II X2 260u and the Samsung Exynos 3475 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the AMD Athlon II X2 260u 2 core processor released in Q3/2009 with the Samsung Exynos 3475 which has 4 CPU cores and was introduced in 2015. |
||
| AMD Athlon II (52) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| AMD Athlon II X2 (Propus) (18) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 3400 (2) |
| 1 | Generation | 3 |
| Propus | Architecture | Cortex-A7 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD Athlon II X2 260u is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.80 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 3475 clocks with 1.30 GHz, has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. |
||
| AMD Athlon II X2 260u | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.80 GHz | Frequency | 1.30 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP1 |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.60 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 3 |
| Technology | 28nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 1 |
| -- | Shader | 16 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP1 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to 16 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the AMD Athlon II X2 260u, while the Samsung Exynos 3475 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled. |
||
| AMD Athlon II X2 260u | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| DDR3-1333 | Memory | LPDDR3-400 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 21.3 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| 2.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| 2.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe AMD Athlon II X2 260u has a TDP of 25 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 3475 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| AMD Athlon II X2 260u | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| 25 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD Athlon II X2 260u has 2.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 45 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 3475 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 28 nm. |
||
| AMD Athlon II X2 260u | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| 45 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| MMX, 3DNow!, SSE3, SSE4a | ISA extensions | -- |
| AM3 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2009 | Release date | 2015 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD Athlon II X2 260u
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 260u
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 260u
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 260u
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 260u
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 260u
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 260u
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
ARM Mali-T720 MP1 @ 0.60 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD Athlon II X2 260u
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD Athlon II X2 260u | Samsung Exynos 3475 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
